Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

This 42 chapter volume represents the state of the art in visual research. It provides an introduction to the field for a variety of visual researchers: scholars and graduate students in art, sociology, anthropology, communication, education, cultural studies, women's studies, ethnic studies, global studies and related social science and humanities disciplines.

The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods encompasses the breadth and depth of the field, and points the way to future research possibilities. It illustrates “cutting edge” as well as long-standing and recognized practices. This text is not only “about” research, it is also an example of the way that the visual can be incorporated in data collection and the presentation of research findings. Contributors to the book are from diverse backgrounds and include both established names in the field and rising stars. Chapters describe a methodology or analytical framework, its strengths and limitations, possible fields of application and practical guidelines on how to apply the method or technique.

The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods is organized into seven main sections:

Framing the Field of Visual Research; Producing Visual Data and Insight; Participatory and Subject-Centered Approaches; Analytical Frameworks and Approaches; Vizualization Technologies and Practices; Moving Beyond the Visual; Options and Issues for Using and Presenting Visual Research

33 Doing and Disseminating Visual Research: Visual Arts-Based Approaches

33 Doing and Disseminating Visual Research: Visual Arts-Based Approaches

33 Doing and disseminating visual research: Visual arts-based approaches
DónalO'Donoghue

In his introduction to the book What is Research in the Visual Arts: Obsession, Archive and Encounter, Marquard Smith asked, ‘How might other models of research from other fields and disciplines influence and shape the future of visual arts research'? (2008: xxi) With this question in mind, this chapter focuses on how models of art practice can influence and shape the future of visual research. Paying close attention to how artists work, and focusing, in particular, on the representational repertoires and scopic regimes they utilize, provides potential alternative inquiry practices, analytical frames, and dissemination possibilities for the field of visual research. The chapter is not intended as a comprehensive review of the many ways of engaging in visual research from an arts-based perspective; rather, it addresses three art forms: installation art, video art, and film.

Introduction

I begin this chapter by considering some of the more obvious connections between visual research and the work and practices of artists who engage documentary methods in their work. I focus specifically on Tacita Dean's 2005 artwork, Presentation Sisters. Following that, I examine, in some detail, the work practices of Willie Doherty, an Irish conceptual artist who works mainly with photography and video. I do this to make visible the ways in which he inquires into issues of social, cultural, and political significance, and to show how he creates opportunities for specific understandings to emerge in and from his work. I focus on his installation Same Difference (1990) to raise questions about how meaning is produced, first in the production of an artwork and subsequently in an encounter with the work. This analysis of Doherty's installation suggests some ways that visual researchers might think about how stories are recorded and constructed, visually and spatially. I discuss how conditions for knowing, and knowing differently, are created in the form of an artwork, and show how meaning is made and empathic understandings are generated in encounters with that artwork. I demonstrate how the choice of medium is closely linked with the types of understanding that can be gleaned from an artwork.

Following the analysis of Doherty's installation, I discuss how his forms of expression used might be taken up in a visual research project. I describe how I created an installation to disseminate findings of a research study that investigated the masculinizing practices of a male single-sex residential teacher training college in Ireland during the opening decades of the twentieth century.1 Similar to Doherty's Same Difference, this installation, which combined visual and textual data from the research study, disseminated the outcomes of the study to a wider and more diverse, largely non-academic, audience. It provided opportunities for relational understanding, and served a further role in the inquiry process by creating new configurations of image and text in an enclosed space while generating new questions about the topic under investigation. As an artwork, it extended and reinterpreted the narratives it depicted (Bourriaud, 2005).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading