Summary
Contents
Subject index
A decade on after it first published to international acclaim, the seminal Handbook of Organization Studies has been updated to capture exciting new developments in the field. Providing a retrospective and prospective overview of organization studies, this Handbook continues to challenge and inspire readers with its synthesis of knowledge and literature. As ever, contributions have been selected to reflect the diversity of the field. New chapters cover areas such as organizational change, knowledge management and organizational networks.
Networks and Organizations
Networks and Organizations
Introduction
Networks provide three broad categories of benefits: access, timeliness and referrals (Burt 1992). They are a ubiquitous and critical feature of organizational life. Organizations have never been isolated, self-sustaining operations; thus all organizations, as well as the individuals within them, are enmeshed in networks at varied, multiple levels. More recently, however, the decline of the vertically integrated firm in favour of outsourcing, the rapid growth of the global economy, the pressing need to access knowledge and resources outside the boundaries of an organization, and the increased co-ordination efforts resulting from spreading an organization's operations to multiple locations around the world, have amplified the salience and variety of networks. This growth has triggered increased scholarly attention both to internal networks within organizations and external linkages across organizations. Over the past two decades, a steady stream of research on networks has exploded into a rich and prolific line of inquiry. Special issues of social science and management journals devoted to the topic have appeared in droves, and the term ‘networking’ now even takes on an instrumental, rather sketchy, connotation in business speech.
We begin with a brief overview of the leading approaches to the study of networks.1 We suggest that much of the extensive literature can be classified in one of two ways: those that use networks as a tool to trace relationships; and those that view networks as a form of governance. We then look at the stages of an organization's life cycle and highlight periods during which networks of various forms play a crucial role. We group our discussion around key stages of organizational evolution, including founding, growth and maturity. This life cycle approach provides a fresh and complementary alternative to other recent reviews of the literature that have emphasized a division into levels of analysis. We not only highlight the current literature, but when appropriate suggest areas where additional work would be beneficial.
Networks as a Tool to Trace Relationships
A long line of work in sociology and social psychology employs networks as an analytical device for illuminating social relations, whether among individuals or groups inside an organization, in the inter-organizational ties that link organizations, or in the environments of organizations. We briefly review below some of the key studies that have shaped how social scientists view networks. The concepts are presented in a roughly chronological order, based on their first introduction. Examples of subsequent work relating to each concept are featured. Nearly all the core concepts originated at the individual level, but today they are used not only to describe relationships between people, but also between organizations, and in some cases nation-states.
Webs of Affiliation
Even before Moreno (1934) devised the familiar nodes and lines of sociograms in the 1930s, Simmel (1955 [1922]) was thinking in network terms when he argued that people's webs of affiliation - the multiple and sometimes overlapping group affiliations that humans have with family members, social organizations and/or occupational groups - were fundamental in defining the social identity of individuals. Simmel's ideas were developed further by a number of researchers. Most notably, Merton (1957) used social circles and role-set theory to emphasize the challenges posed from having multiple roles called upon at the same time (e.g. parent and employee), but also the benefit of autonomy that could result from publicly identifying the demands attached to different roles. Kadushin (1966; 1968) refined the definition of social circles, viewing them as entities without formal membership, rules or leadership that provide a rich environment for forming interpersonal connections. He showed how the presence of influential social circles could be inferred from the behavioural similarities among collections of individuals. More recently, studies of friendship networks (Marsden 1987; Moody 2001) as well as corporate elites (Useem 1984; Kadushin 1995) point out the cultural underpinnings of network ties.
...
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches