Summary
Contents
Subject index
The Handbook of Community Practice is the first volume in this field, encompassing community development, organizing, planning, and social change, and the first community practice text that provides in-depth treatment of globalization—including its impact on communities in the United States and in international development work. The Handbook is grounded in participatory and empowerment practice including social change, social and economic development, feminist practice, community-collaboratives, and engagement in diverse communities. It utilizes the social development perspective and employs analyses of persistent poverty, policy practice, and community research approaches as well as providing strategies for advocacy and social and legislative action.
Participatory Methods in Community Practice: Popular Education and Participatory Rural Appraisal
Participatory Methods in Community Practice: Popular Education and Participatory Rural Appraisal
In its 10th Human Development Report, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, 2000) focused on human development and human rights, describing seven basic freedoms necessary for human development:
- Freedom from discrimination by gender, race, ethnicity, national origin or religion
- Freedom from want, to enjoy a decent standard of living
- Freedom to develop and realize one's human potential
- Freedom from fear of threats to personal security, from torture, arbitrary arrest and other violent acts
- Freedom from injustice and violations of the rule of law
- Freedom of thought and speech and to participate in decision-making and form associations
- Freedom for decent work without exploitation (UNDP, 2000, p. 1)
Although all these freedoms are important to community practice, this chapter will focus on the sixth freedom. The freedom to think and speak and participate in decision making is a basic right of any democracy, but it is easily eroded, even in nations believed to be mature democracies. In the United States, for instance, citizens easily fall into assumptions that only a select few should speak and participate in most decisions. In a society that places such a high value on formal education, we often dismiss those who have little formal education as having no knowledge. Even as professionals in community practice, we often believe that by demonstrating our personal expertise in problem assessment and problem resolution, we are more useful than if we help other people discover and solve their own problems.
Paulo Freire, a Brazilian educator, always asked the teachers he was training to lead literacy programs, “What is: ‘to know’?” (Vella, 1989, p. 37). How do we know something ourselves, and how do we know what others know? This chapter focuses on how we help others to uncover and make use of the knowledge they have acquired through living and becoming adults—how we help others (re)discover, validate, and use what they already know. It also connects the practice of knowing and learning from life experiences to group- and community-level participation and action.
This chapter introduces two participatory methods that can be used in community practice: popular education and Participatory Rural Appraisal. We outline the ideas behind each method, describe the “how to” or practice of each method, and provide a concrete example of each method's use. The goal of this chapter is to enable community practitioners to become more participatory and empowering in their work, and thus more firmly rooted in the hopes and dreams of the communities they serve.
Popular Education
Popular education is a participatory method that is particularly useful for drawing forth the wisdom, knowledge, and skills that people have gained from their everyday life experiences—and for using that experiential wisdom to begin to look more critically at the systems in which they live their lives. Popular education, which usually occurs outside of formal educational institutions, is education for collective action and social change (Arnold, Burke, James, Martin, & Thomas, 1991; Castelloe & Watson, 1999; Freire, 1970; Nadeau, 1996). This method is most often associated with the work of Paulo Freire in the Global South (Freire, 1970, 1996) and Myles Horton of the Highlander Research and Education Center in the United States (Glen, 1996; Horton & Freire, 1990; Horton, Kohl, & Kohl, 1990).
...
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches