Summary
Contents
Subject index
For the first time, research on implicit cognitive processes relevant for the understanding of addictive behaviors and their prevention or treatment is brought together in one volume! The Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction features the work of an internationally renowned group of contributing North American and European authors who draw together developments in basic research on implicit cognition with recent developments in addiction research. Editors Reinout W. Wiers and Alan W. Stacy examine recent findings from a variety of disciplines including basic memory and experimental psychology, experimental psychopathology, emotion, and neurosciences.
Word Association Tests of Associative Memory and Implicit Processes: Theoretical and Assessment Issues
Word Association Tests of Associative Memory and Implicit Processes: Theoretical and Assessment Issues
Abstract: Word association is one of the most commonly used measures of association in cognitive science. These tests have been used to infer association parameters in normative studies, to derive cues and primes used in diverse paradigms (semantic priming, cued recall, illusory memory), to test implicit memory in experimental studies, and to suggest the operation of implicit processes in nonexperimental work. This chapter briefly outlines some of the historical routes and current controversies about association and summarizes basic cognitive research applying associative tests. The authors then describe benefits and limitations of the tests, as well as implications for theory and interventions on drug use.
This chapter briefly outlines some of the historical routes of word association and then summarizes several of the major streams of basic cognitive research revealing the value of these tests. We delineate several current controversies from this basic research and suggest why they are critical for understanding drug-related cognitions and behavior. We then address benefits, limitations, and further implications of the tests.
A Brief History of Word Association
The concept of association can be traced back to Aristotle and was not refined substantially until the effort of the British empiricists (Dawson, 2004). Some of Aristotle's primary concepts such as contiguity, similarity, and sequence effects anticipated a variety of associationist and connectionist models of the last century and today. In the 19th century, John Mill's philosophical work on association was a precursor of contemporary notions that associations can come together in new constellations that have emergent properties. William James (1913) elaborated on the importance of cognitive sequences, suggesting that one brain state leads to activity of another state that has been previously associated with the first. This idea and other concepts from James (e.g., pattern association) anticipated a number of subsequent developments in connectionist models (Dawson, 2004) that have been viewed as substantial elaborations or expansions of earlier associationism evolved to embrace emergent properties, distributed representations, nonlinear activation rules, and other innovations (Bechtel & Abrahamsen, 2002). As revealed below, association is still alive and well in contemporary cognitive research.
Word association has become one of the primary methods used to infer association in cognitive research, whether cast in terms of associative or connectionist models. The first research the authors found using this method was conducted by Francis Galton in 1879 (Crovitz, 1970). Although he is better known for his interest in evolution and heredity, he also studied the association of ideas in thought (Boring, 1950). Galton's results influenced the subsequent work of Jung (1910) as well as Wundt and Catell (Cattell & Bryant, 1889; Thome & Henley, 2001).
Freud began developing his method of free association for psychoanalysis in 1892 and might have been influenced by Galton (Thorne & Henley, 2001), but the method does not normally use word association tests. Instead, the patient is expected to talk freely about a symptom or a dream (Freud, 1995). On the other hand, free association as it is used in studies of verbal behavior and cognition implies free word association, in which the participant is instructed to respond with the first word or series of words that come to mind when presented with a word or phrase as a stimulus (Woodworth, 1921). In a controlled word association test, the participant is instructed to respond with words from a certain category (e.g., name animals that are mammals; Woodworth, 1921).
...
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches