Summary
Contents
Subject index
Corrections looks at the correctional system and offers arguments for and against the practice of the laws and policies that comprise corrections, from parole and probation to imprisonment, to the application of the death penalty. The 20 included chapters, written by eminent scholars and experts in the fields of criminology, police science, law, sociology, psychology, and other disciplines, take on such contested topics as what the goals of the correctional system should be (deterrence, rehabilitation, retribution, or something else?) and how they should be achieved; who should make these decisions; and how to balance the goals of the correctional system with the civil rights of the inmates. Prison conditions and the treatment of prisoners, as well as the changing definition of cruel and unusual punishment, are also examined.The SeriesEach volume consists of approximately 20 chapters offering succinct pro/con examinations, and Recommended Readings conclude each chapter, highlighting different approaches to or perspectives on the issue at hand. As a set, these volumes provide perfect reference support for students writing position papers in undergraduate courses spanning the Criminal Justice curriculum. Each title is approximately 350 pages in length.
Early Release
Early Release
Early release from prison is not as simple as the words early and release might suggest. Historical analysis of prison release policies and practices yields a wealth of penal thinking that dates back nearly 140 years. Part of the difficulty in discussing early release stems from the variety of types of release and the legal, political, and social contexts surrounding release decisions. Early release—also commonly called controlled release, conditional release, and/or discretionary release—is the discharge of a prison or jail inmate prior to the end of their legally imposed sentence. This includes (1) compassionate release, for terminally ill inmates who generally cannot care for themselves any longer; (2) parole or probation, which is discretionary or mandatory release to a period of post-incarceration supervision; (3) earned or discretionary release without post-release supervision; (4) exoneration, for a prisoner later found not guilty; (5) commutation or clemency, a governmental release without forgiving crime; and (6) pardon, a governmental release with crime forgiveness.
The History of Early Release
Founded in the Pennsylvania Quaker system under the guidance of William Penn, America'first prisons were designed to produce a reflection of sins and a recommitment to societal norms. Penitents entered penitentiaries to reform themselves during a pre-arranged length of stay (a flat sentence). At the end of their time, they were released under an assumption of repentance but without any formal assessment. Philadelphia'High Street Jail (1682) and Pennsylvania'Western (1818) and Eastern (1820) State Penitentiaries are good examples of these types of prisons. A slightly different penal ideology emerged out of New York'Auburn Prison (1816). Auburn worked on a step-model, where prisoners were initially isolated but were later allowed contact with other inmates. After a rash of suicides and other mental illnesses among inmates that many claimed erupted from sustained, forced isolation, Auburn switched to a system that allowed silent labor among other prisoners during the day and forced isolation only in the evenings. In both New York and Pennsylvania, inmates served the entire length of their sentence without any discretionary or early release.
Influenced by early prison reformers both inside and outside of the United States, early release developed as a result of the need for incentives within institutional environments. In the United States, good-time laws emerged as early as 1817 in New York State, when prison administrators began asking their state legislatures for a way to reward well-behaved inmates. By the mid-1800s, nearly half the states had good-time laws in place. Abroad, Captain Alexander Maconochie, the Scottish Warden of Norfolk Island—a notoriously rough Australian prison—developed the mark system, where inmates could earn their freedom early through hard work and good behavior. At the same time, Sir Walter Crofton, director of an Irish prison, began to question how penitentiaries were achieving repentance if inmates were never ascribed this status and given release as reward. Crofton developed what he called “the Irish system,” where inmates progressed through various custody stages from solitary confinement, to group work, and finally to a type of halfway house where they reestablished relations with their community. If prisoners completed the stages successfully, they were said to have earned a “ticket of leave.” Crofton took his version of early release a step further by having community members supervise former inmates post-incarceration as a component of their conditional release.
...
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches