Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

I jumped at the chance to shepherd this collection. This was personal for me. In the past, when I had prepared to teach courses on political leadership, I had come up with a dearth of recent scholarly attention to the topic.Perhaps my perspective on politics and leadership exacerbated the difficulty of my search. I had in mind a politics that touched all aspects of power and authority in our lives (not just government), encouraged the moral imagination, and affirmed human agency that could make the future better than the present. I searched with limited success for material that would explain how all of us shape and are shaped by politics. My perspective on leadership may have also hindered my search. I had in mind the simple notion of taking initiative on behalf of shared values. I found too little material about leadership that extended beyond the spectacle of authority and its assumption of hierarchy. I wanted to explain that each of us, regardless of our place in a hierarchy, has a calling to lead - to act on behalf of our moral imagination. Editing this volume permitted me the chance to develop the material I sought. I (as well as other teachers) no longer have a shortage of material relating politics and leadership with each other. (From the Introduction.)

Altruism

Altruism

The purpose of this chapter is to examine relations between altruism and leadership. The chapter opens with an examination of the concept of altruism, followed by a brief review of biological and psychological theory and research on altruism and prosocial behavior. Leadership emergence and the costs and benefits of leadership are then discussed. This discussion addresses why, in some conditions, altruistic people take on leadership roles, and why, in other conditions, positions of leadership induce those who fill them to behave in altruistic ways. Evidence is presented that men are more strongly disposed than women are to view and use leadership in selfish ways, and that women are more strongly disposed than men are to adopt an altruistic leadership orientation. The chapter closes with a discussion of the influence of self-serving motives on attributions of altruism and decisions about leadership.

What is Altruism?

It is important for those who write about altruism to define the construct, because the word altruism has been defined in many different ways. Defined in some ways, altruism is easy to achieve. Defined in other ways, it is an impossible ideal.

All definitions of altruism contain criteria that acts must meet to qualify as altruistic. In some cases, the criteria are based on the consequences of acts; in other cases, they are based on the intentions of the individuals who perpetrate the acts. All consequence-based definitions of altruism require that an act must benefit a recipient. Some definitions also require that the act must be costly to donors. The benefits and costs in question may be genetic (e.g., helping others propagate their genes at an expense to one's own genetic success), biological (e.g., sacrificing one's life to save someone else's life), physical (e.g., agreeing to take an electric shock to prevent a victim from being shocked), material (e.g., donating money to charity or donating food to a food bank), or psychological (e.g., forgoing an enjoyable activity to comfort a friend). Controversy has arisen with respect to trade-offs between different kinds of costs and benefits. For example, do acts of charity that increase donors’ self-esteem or enhance their reputations qualify as altruistic?

When people make attributions of altruism in their everyday lives, they tend to place greater emphasis on the intentions of donors than on the consequences of their acts. People implicitly assume that to qualify as altruistic, acts must be aimed at benefiting recipients as an end in itself, and to quality as a truly altruistic person, an individual must be motivated to enhance the welfare of others without regard for his or her own welfare. Acts that benefit others incidentally or accidentally and acts that benefit others to make a good impression, to ingratiate, or to enhance self-esteem do not meet this criterion.

An Overview of Theory and Research on Altruism

There are two main sources of theory and research on altruism—evolutionary biology and psychology. Evolutionary biologists tend to define altruism in terms of the biological and genetic consequences of behaviors. Psychologists tend to define it either in terms of such psychological consequences of behaviors as pain and pleasure or in terms of the intentions of donors or helpers. The following sections provide a brief overview of research from each source, and then the implications for leadership are explored.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading