Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

THE WORLD HEALTH Organization (WHO) defines universal healthcare coverage as “access to key promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative health interventions for all at an affordable cost, thereby achieving equity in access.” Under this definition, a population is said to enjoy universal healthcare if every member of that population is able to obtain access to needed healthcare services. Ordinarily, such services include physicians’ care (including preventive care), admission to hospitals, and supplies of medicine or medical devices. The universal healthcare principle does not necessarily preclude the payment of fees by users of needed healthcare services. However, it does require that such services be available to all, including those who lack the ability to pay.

Because healthcare services are costly, policymakers who seek to implement universal healthcare coverage must decide how to pay for, or finance, its cost. Moreover, in order to control that cost, policymakers also must specify the particular healthcare services that will be guaranteed to all. In its 2000 World Health Report, WHO stated that policymakers should strive “to make funding available, as well as to set the right financial incentives for providers, to ensure that all individuals have access to effective public health and personal healthcare.”

Universal access to healthcare may be financed in many ways. Most often, where it exists, universal healthcare is financed through public social insurance, private health insurance, or some combination of the two. Under public social insurance plans, governments may provide healthcare services directly to their citizens, or may pay for health services that are provided by third-party caregivers in the private sector. Either way, governments must finance such plans through taxation, borrowing, or the receipt of international aid. If taxation is relied upon, then the form of taxation selected to finance universal healthcare coverage will determine the extent to which wealthier taxpayers will subsidize healthcare for the less fortunate.

Under a health coverage system financed by progressive income taxation, high-income taxpayers will cross-subsidize healthcare for the poor. A universal health coverage system financed by sales or consumption taxes, in contrast, would tend to be less redistributive because wealthy people tend to consume a smaller portion of their incomes than others. Private insurance plans, including group health plans purchased by employers for their employees, are not designed to redistribute wealth.

Western Countries

In 1946, the United Kingdom became the first noncommunist nation to provide universal healthcare coverage to all residents. Implementing a proposal set forth by British economist William Beveridge in his 1942 report “Social Insurance and Allied Services” (the Beveridge Report), the United Kingdom established the taxpayer-financed National Health Service (NHS), a government agency that that employs healthcare professionals who provide service directly to British residents. Most western European nations followed suit. In 1957, Canada implemented a “single-payer” system, in which the government pays for—but does not directly provide—healthcare services to Canadian residents.

In Canada and western Europe, private health insurance plans remain available to supplement the basic universal health coverage provided by the government. In these countries, private insurance serves to cover certain healthcare services not paid for by the government, to reduce waiting time for services, and/or to cover additional costs of care.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading