Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

SOME PEOPLE FIND it hard to understand or explain why people are poor in such a wealthy country as the United States. Poverty in the United States is a complicated subject. In order to observe it, one has to define it. Armed with a definition, one can designate which individuals in society experience it. A logical next question is, “Why are those people poor?” The level of complication rises enormously with this question. Where the poor are located is less complex, though it must rely on good data. As complicated as the question above is, the question of what should be done to reduce or eliminate poverty is even more challenging. How do genetics play in? What role should individual responsibility have? What should government involvement be? Where can an interested person read more?

What is Poverty in the United States?

According to the Merriam Webster online dictionary, poverty is “the state of one who lacks a usual or socially acceptable amount of money or material possessions”; destitution is “extreme poverty that threatens life itself through starvation or exposure.” The astute reader will realize at the outset that usual or socially acceptable are rather vague terms. While these terms imply that poverty is a relative (that is, depends on the levels of other variables) concept, destitution causes one to think that it is an absolute (that is, it is fixed in terms of a known standard) measure.

The phrase, threatens life itself, leaves one little room to wonder about the levels of other variables. The 2005 Live Aid concerts from Philadelphia to Tokyo were staged to draw media attention to the absolute poverty in many parts of present-day Africa, as the Group of 8 industrialized nations’ leaders met in Scotland to discuss world affairs. Absolute poverty will not disappear anytime soon. Relative poverty, by definition, can only go away if each individual has the same socioeconomic status. This also will not happen anytime soon.

If one is to do something about poverty, how does one operationalize the definition? There needs to be a statistical definition of poverty. A U.S. pioneer in that effort was Mollie Orshansky. For the most-accepted version of her poverty threshold, she used a U.S. Department of Agriculture (DOA) “economy” food plan designed for adequate nutrition with low available funds. From a previous survey by the DOA, she learned that the average family of three or more members spent about one-third of its income on food. Hence, she multiplied the cost of the food plan by three to get the income (after tax, in her view) that would be considered the poverty threshold for a family of that size. Orshansky made adjustments for different family sizes and other demographic attributes, and generated a table of 124 poverty thresholds expressed in 1963 dollars. For bureaucratic reasons, before-tax income was eventually used. A person (family) is considered poor if income falls below the threshold.

Table 1. 2004 Poverty Thresholds Source: US Census Bureau 2004
Size of Family UnitRelated Children under 18 years
1 person0123
Under 65 years9,827
65 and over9,060
2 persons
Under 65 years12,64913,020
65 and over11,41812,971
3 persons14,77615,20515,219
4 persons19,48419,80319,15719,223
5 persons23,49723,83823,10822,543
6 persons27,02527,13326,57326,037
7 persons31,09631,29030,62130,154
8 persons34,77835,08634,45433,901
9 persons or more41,83642,03941,48041,010

One might get the impression that “adequate diet” is related to avoiding starvation and destitution, and that the Orshansky thresholds reflect an absolute measure of poverty. If so, then does the threshold become relative as it moves through time? Some scholars argue that the answer is a definite “yes.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading