Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

MEASURING THE WELL-BEING OF individuals, households, and nations—the process and techniques of poverty assessment—is critical for policymakers, governments, international organizations, aid agencies, and social scientists. Measuring poverty is complex. It is generally agreed that poverty is a multidimensional phenomenon with both monetary and nonmonetary aspects in need of analysis. Poverty can involve, among other things, reduced incomes, consumption and employment, insufficient or poor-quality nutrition, poor health conditions, limited access to education, low levels of participation in decision-making, and lack of personal empowerment, reflected in the limited possibility to influence one's life. Poverty can also be absolute or relative, temporary or chronic, and the determination of who is poor can be highly subjective depending on one's perspective and specific assessment methodology in hand.

Quantitative Approaches

Conventionally, poverty has been largely defined in terms of income or expenditure based on the assumption that a person's or household's material standard of living largely determines her well-being. The poor are then identified as those with a material standard of living below a certain level or poverty line. Where this level is set determines how many people are poor and how many are not, itself a rather subjective process.

Nevertheless, institutions dealing with the alleviation of poverty, such as the World Bank and the United Nations, regularly utilize the poverty threshold. Since countries and regions within a country differ in terms of their standard of living, most experts agree that the poverty threshold must be set at different levels depending, among other things, on the specific country, region, and urban/rural location.

An absolute definition of poverty assumes that it is possible to define the basic needs of the generic individual regardless of one's physical location in the world, based on the minimum standard of living and one's physiological needs for water, clothing, and shelter. In contrast, the relative approach defines poverty in relation to a generally accepted standard of living in a specific society at a specific time.

An advantage of the absolute approach is that there are some reasonably objective norms that could be applied to peoples and societies worldwide and thus allow for cross-country comparisons of poverty rates, while with the relative approach the decision of what is an acceptable minimum standard of living can be subjective and depend on the societal and personal norms of the researcher.

Systematic poverty assessment techniques have been in place since the 19th century. In 1899 a study of poverty in the city of York, England, primarily used a quantitative approach, relying on household income and expenditure surveys. Today, cross-country comparisons of poverty are done by comparing the relative median incomes of households on what the World Bank economists have devised as the purchasing power parity (PPP) level, and by comparing the percentages of the total number of households in a given country living under poverty. In 2000, for example, based on various survey studies worldwide, the World Bank estimated that over 25 percent of the population of the developing world lived below the poverty line of $1 per person per day on the PPP basis.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading