Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

CONSUMPTION-BASED measures of poverty are a class of poverty indicators that use consumption as a measure of individual welfare. A poverty measurer can be described in terms of three main characteristics: a measure of individual welfare; a poverty line, that is, a threshold for the welfare measure below which an individual is classified as poor; and a summary statistic, for instance the proportion of the population below the poverty line (headcount ratio). Consumption and income are the most common measures of individual well-being that have been used to obtain poverty indicators.

Household surveys typically contain information on household expenditure for several product categories. However, household expenditure is a satisfactory measure of living standards only if everyone faces the same prices and everyone lives in households with the same size and composition. In most cases we observe households of different sizes living across regions or neighborhoods with different prices. Therefore, we have to make some adjustments to obtain a proper con-sumption-based welfare measure.

Two measures are the most commonly used to adjust for differences in prices: the money metric utility, proposed by P.A. Samuelson, and the welfare ratio, based on C. Blackorby and D. Donaldson. A. Deaton and S. Zaidi provide a discussion of the theoretical foundations and the practical implementation of these two measures.

Adjustments are necessary to get a consumption-based measure of standard of living. For instance, it is very common that rural households should invest part of their income into agricultural production inputs such as fertilizer, water, or seed. These expenditures should not be considered as household consumption but as investments. Otherwise we would overstate the actual welfare levels achieved by households. Deaton and Zaidi describe other types of adjustments for durable goods, rationing, public goods, and leisure.

Consumption versus Income

There is a good deal of consensus on the value of using consumption as a summary measure of living standards. In recent years, researchers at the World Bank have used consumption-based measures constructed from survey data to measure poverty, to analyze changes in living standards, and to assess the distributional impacts of antipoverty policies. There are several reasons why consumption can be a better measure of welfare than income.

Consumption can provide a better picture of actual standards of living when income fluctuates significantly. In particular, consumption takes into account whether households can access credit markets or household savings at times when current income is low because of, for instance, seasonal variations. Furthermore, consumption may be better measured than income in poor economies with large informal sectors where households consume their own production or exchange it for some other goods.

  • consumption-based measures of poverty
VictorAguirregabiria, Boston University

Bibliography

C.Blackorby and D.Donaldson, “Welfare Ratios and Distributionally Sensitive Cost-Benefit Analysis,” Journal of Public Economics (v.34, 1987)
C.Blackorby and D.Donaldson, “Money Metric Utility: A Harmless Normalization?” Journal of Economic Theory (v.46, 1988)
A.Deaton, The Analysis of Household Surveys: Microeconometric Analysis for Development Policy (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997) http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/0-8018-5254-4
A.Deaton and S.Zaidi, “Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis,” LSMS Working

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading