Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Stereotypes may be described as the result of cognitive procedures leading to the process of categorization, one of the most important tools our mind has to organize knowledge and deal with the complexity of reality. At the same time, however, stereotypes are the expression of values and are used to express a general idea of a certain social group, as if this agreement were preexistent, regardless of the stereotype. Stereotypes freeze the characteristics of a social group and block its potential for development during an interaction or narration. Stereotypes therefore offer a false simplicity of reality, since they condense a large amount of information and connotations. To be truly valid, they need to collect a wide consensus, and hence, once they are stated, they become the expression of the values of a society. It is through stereotypes that we obtain our understanding of a particular social group. For these reasons, the analysis of gender stereotypes provides invaluable data to understand what we expect from women and men and what we mean by “female” and “male” behaviors.

Gender Stereotypes

Gender stereotypes (stereotypes of women and of men) are shared hypersimplified images or representations of reality that influence collective thinking by filling with specific contents the convictions and ideas of a determinate social group regarding men and women and the relationships between them. Among these, we find “Men are better at repairing/maintaining things in the home; women are better at housework”; “Little boys are stronger and livelier than little girls”; “Boys do not cry.”

Men and women are also perceived as complementary; that is, biologically destined to an eternal relation of attraction (“What is a woman without a man?; And a man without a woman?”; “Women and men reciprocally complete each other”; “Men are naturally attracted by women; women are naturally attracted by men”). Furthermore, bodily features are synonymous with differences in skills and aptitudes. Hence the idea of the “naturalness” of a system of gender relations marked by an unequal distribution of material and symbolic resources. And so we have women who are “good at” caring work, and “rational,” “dynamic,” and “stronger” men who successfully devote themselves to economic activities and supporting their families.

The social construction of fatherhood and motherhood is also outlined, sustained, and strengthened by many commonplaces: “Children must stay with their mother”; “Women are made to be wives and mothers”; “Women are fulfilled when they become mothers, men in supporting their family”; “Fathers are not very suited to caring activities.”

It can be easily understood that these stereotypes have driven female and male apart and often set them against each other. This rigid conception of the man-woman relation has also created an often very burdensome constraint-for both sexes. A key example is that the rejection of femininity continues to constitute one of the main organizers of hegemonic masculinity. Whatever race, social class, age, ethnic group, or sexual orientation one belongs to, being a man means above all “not being a woman.” Antifemininity (together with the principle of the “natural” subordination of female to male) is at the heart of the contemporary and historical idea of masculinity, so much so that virility is described more in negative terms (what a man is not) than in positive ones (what he is). We also mention a continuing ambivalence toward women in positions of power and authority: women have been limited by gender-coded lines drawn between their roles in the public and private sphere, in the home and the polis.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading