Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Childbirth is simultaneously a natural, social, culturally bound, and political event. Evolutionary biologists know that the pelvis of the female human is different than the pelvis of the female primate; the human's pelvis is flatter, causing a more challenging birth for women than primates. Because of the pain that accompanies childbirth, most females around the world have always desired to have social support during labor and delivery. Across cultures, very few communities encourage women to be alone during labor and delivery. As a result, a human birth is a social enterprise, influenced by community values, norms, and ideologies. Childbirth is an event that influences and is influenced by the communities in which it occurs.

Until approximately 300 years ago, childbirth practices were surprisingly similar across cultural communities. In most localities, the laboring woman guided the process. She determined what position she wanted to be in while laboring as well as the foods she wanted to eat and with whom to share the birth experience. Often, babies were delivered in homes with the assistance of family members or a midwife. It was a personal, intense, and intimate experience. For the most part, men were not present, making the birthing area a female-dominated space-one in which the women present were assumed to bear the knowledge necessary to successfully deliver the baby. And for thousands of years, they did just that.

The Technocratic Model of Childbirth

Birthing methods began to change globally when the industrial revolution changed the economic and cultural landscape in Europe. In France, males began to take on tasks previously relegated to midwives, inventing tools such as the birthing forceps that allowed them to intervene when they believed a baby was not moving adequately through the birth canal. By the 19th century, most births in Europe were managed by male physicians. Trained physicians as well as expectant women now placed high value on standardization of childbirth procedures. University-educated male physicians, certainly not uneducated women, were considered the authorities on childbirth. Considering that the traditional model of childbirth was dominant for thousands of years, the medical model rapidly displaced it in Europe and, eventually, in many parts of the world. Assumed to be uncivilized and unsafe, the traditional birthing model was replaced by the technocratic model, which grew out of the Enlightenment-a period during which the scientific method was glorified.

The ancient methods of delivering babies were no longer trusted; they were not grounded in science and did not utilize modern technologies. An illustration of this shift in trust is the movement of births from the home to the hospital. The widespread belief was that delivering a baby in a hospital was safer for mother and child-despite the prevalence of deadly germs. When it was discovered that women and infants were dying due to the spread of disease within hospitals, sterilization procedures were developed, but they proved ineffective at first. Maternal morbidity did not decrease at all in many parts of Europe after the industrial revolution. In 1898, maternal death was higher among the middle and upper classes in London than the lower class. The primary difference between these two sets of expectant women was that the middle-and upper-class women delivered in hospitals while the lower-class women delivered their babies in homes under the care of a midwife.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading