Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The horrific high-tech weapons of 20th-century warfare give deadly meaning to Russian surgeon Nikolai Pirogov's defini-tion of war as an epidemic of trauma. However, 18th and 19th century wars might more accurately be described as epidemics of disease. Throughout the nation's first 145 years, more American soldiers died of infectious diseases than from battle injuries. Even in minor conflicts, microbes proved more deadly than bullets: in the Second Seminole War, 75 percent of deaths were attributable to malaria.

Death tolls understate the impact of disease on warfare. Healthy combatants win wars; the sick are ineffective. Debilitation from disease causes an enormous drain on an army's resources and compromises its fighting strength. For every typhoid fever victim who died in the Spanish– American War in the 19th century, for example, 13 survived and were unfit for duty for at least two months. The 20,738 cases of typhoid fever that occurred during that war were the equal of 20 infantry regiments out of action.

Infectious diseases were the bane of 18th and 19th-century armies. As physicians of that era had few effective remedies, the greatest contributions of military medicine were to disease prevention. With the groundwork in preven-tive medicine laid, 20th-century military medicine focused more on the management of mass casualties, trauma surgery, and psychiatry.

Preventive Medicine

Immunization

The American invasion of Canada in 1775 failed because of a smallpox epidemic. Smallpox was so dangerous in the camps and on campaign that Gen. George Washington became convinced that only variolation (smallpox inocula-tion) could prevent the destruction of his army. Evidence of British efforts to infect American troops with smallpox strengthened Washington's resolve to pursue this course. Introduced in Boston in 1721, variolation consisted of inserting matter from a smallpox pustule under the skin of a healthy individual. A mild attack of the disease usually ensued, followed by lifelong immunity against smallpox. (Most British soldiers had either survived the disease in childhood or been inoculated in the military.) Because inoc-ulated soldiers actually contracted the disease, they had to be quarantined. But the military risks of troops temporarily sidelined were far less than those posed by an epidemic. The Continental Army's adoption in 1777 of mandatory inoculation was the most significant medical success of the Revolutionary War. A smallpox-free Army contributed sub-stantially to winning the war.

In 1798 British physician Edward Jenner introduced the safer method of vaccination (L. vaccinia, cowpox). Scratched into the skin of healthy subjects, cowpox virus (obtained from lesions on a cow's teat) conferred immunity to small-pox. Vaccination soon became the method of choice for pre-venting smallpox. On the eve of the War of 1812, Sec. of War William Eustis, a physician, ordered the vaccination of all American troops. Its success spurred Congress in 1813 to establish a vaccination program for civilians.

Smallpox mortality rates plummeted in the late 1800s as vaccination gained widespread acceptance, and a milder strain of smallpox, Variola minor, replaced the more viru-lent Variola major. By the 1970s Americans were no longer routinely vaccinated against smallpox. In 1979 the Global Commission for the Certification of Smallpox Eradication reported the eradication of the disease. In the 21st cen-tury, fears of bioterrorism have revived interest in small-pox vaccination.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading