Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

On April 20, 1999, 17-year-old Dylan Klebold and 18-year-old Eric Harris captured worldwide attention. The two boys, both white and from privileged socioeconomic backgrounds, went on a killing spree in their Littleton, Colorado, high school. Before they turned their guns on themselves and ended their lives, 13 people lay dead, and more than 20 others were wounded. They were not the first young killers to murder their classmates senselessly in recent years and, tragically, these boys were not the last ones to participate in acts of mass destruction.

Youth violence continues to dominate the daily newspapers and evening news in the 21st century. Mass shootings characterized by multiple victims, often randomly targeted, by unhappy, angry, and alienated children and adolescents using high-powered weaponry clearly represent the most extreme form of youth violence. Although there is some evidence that incidents of this nature are increasing, fortunately, they remain rare events involving little more than a dozen youth over the last 10 years. In contrast, the number of arrestees who are known to be under 18 years of age for one of the four types of violent crimes has increased since the mid-1980s, averaging almost 100,000 per year from 1991 to 2000. More specifically, across this 10-year period, on the average, 2,150 juveniles (defined as children under 18 years of age) were arrested for murder and nonnegligent manslaughter; 4,230 more for forcible rape; another 33,454 for robbery; and 56,863 others for aggravated assault.

Putting Youth Violence in Perspective

In November 1993, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno characterized youth violence as the greatest crime problem facing the United States. Her assessment was based on an examination of all arrests reported to the FBI by police agencies across the United States for violent crimes since the mid-1980s. The former prosecutor's depiction shocked many, because arrest data had indicated that violent crime in the United States had been declining for several years. Reno wanted the American public to know that juvenile involvement in violent crime was increasing at an unprecedented pace during a time when the violent crime rate among adults had been decreasing.

The number of arrests of minors for violent crimes in the United States continued to soar through 1994, a year when juveniles accounted for close to 20% of the 645,000 people arrested for violent crime for whom age was known. During the next 6 years, the number of juveniles arrested for one of the violent crimes decreased each year. Many were quick to suggest that the tide of youth violence had subsided, after noting that the percentage of violent crime arrestees who were juveniles had decreased continuously from 19.4% in 1994 to 15.9% in 2000. Examination of juvenile arrest data over a generation, however, clearly reveals that violent crime by those under 18 years of age remains a very serious problem in the United States. Over the 30-year period from 1967 to 1996, juvenile involvement in violent crime increased substantially. The increase is particularly apparent when juvenile arrests for violent crime are compared over the 30-year period in rates, which control for any changes in the population over the time frame.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading