Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

A History of Violence In Religions

Throughout their histories, religions have shared a common process, enduring long periods of persecution, seeing the coming of heroic religious martyrs and missionary leaders, fighting long wars of expansion and conquest, surviving times of internal factional struggles for doctrinal purity or supremacy, resisting the temptation to blend in with other religions and philosophies of neighbors, and adjusting to times of dramatic growth and increasing popular acceptance. Between the major religions lie wide gulfs of mutual distrust and antagonism, historical disagreements, territorial encroachments, wars, and feuds. These struggles highlight the violent nature of the conflict that continues to the present between radically differing worldviews, clashing cultural values, and rival political ideologies that date back to the beginnings of their common recorded history.

The history of religious violence in the West is as long as the historical record of its three major religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, with their involved mutual antagonisms and struggles to adapt and survive the secular forces that threaten their continued existence. With belief systems developed over thousands of years, religions attract adherents of every possible political persuasion. The rise of religious fundamentalism has helped define how followers relate to their world, how they see their place in the world, and the moral structures that will help them live in harmony with their religious teachings.

The historical record is replete with the histories of religious conflicts, wars caused by religious expansion, the clash of religious cultures, and factional infighting. Religions that define themselves as peaceloving communities and transmitters of a body of religious truths still tend to demonize and denigrate the religions of their opponents. They proclaim to the world that their mission to mankind is to establish peace and harmony, yet they maintain the purity of their cause by oppressing members of their own religions and those of others. They believe that peace will arrive after a hostile world accepts and embraces their message. What the historical record shows is a near constant state of violent conflict between and within these philosophical systems.

Violence of all kinds, religious, ethnic, or political, is accepted as a fact of life. The major religions of the West do share a common monotheism; they honor many of the same historical religious figures and share some overlapping areas of doctrinal beliefs. For thousands of years, a broad variety of religious philosophies of all kinds have entered the long struggle for survival and dominance in the culture wars of Western history. In the 20th century, all three major religions witnessed a rebirth of fundamentalist religious movements, with radical groups appearing at their fringes that accept violence and terrorism as the means of bringing about their vision of a new order. They see acts of violence and terrorism as sacramental acts performed as divine imperatives.

Major Religions Embracing Violence

Christianity

Christianity was seen in its infancy as little more than another troublesome radical Jewish sect. Jesus warned his followers that they would need to sell their cloaks to purchase swords. As Christianity spread throughout the Mediterranean area, it was strengthened and changed by a successful missionary movement that gained new converts from what the Jews felt were pagans and longtime enemies. The religion struggled to survive persecution from the Jewish and Roman authorities. Along with a belief in its infancy in the efficacy of Jewish ritual and dietary regulation from its parent religion (Judaism), Christianity became a religion with a group of its own historical writings that are accepted as the “word of God,” combined with portions of the Jewish canon of scripture and the Old Testament. It also retained a tendency to passionate factionalism; coped with persistent problems with schism and doctrinal orthodoxy; and maintained a belief in nonviolence tempered with a provisional acceptance of war and other forms of officially sanctioned violence as acceptable under certain specific exemptions—the concept of a “just war.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading