Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Urban settlements produce waste of multifarious kinds through their very functioning. The management of and failure to manage such wastes have often been taken as indexes of civilization— that is the spirit of civitas, and urban citizenship. Modern technologies have emphasized the hiding of waste and its removal far from the city as speedily and unobtrusively as possible. This distancing reflects the moral coding of waste—as both wasteful, shameful even, and thus symbolically contaminating those near it. The disappearance of waste may be said to lead to both a popular and academic oversight of waste in urban studies as a literally invisible issue. Wastes of various sorts reflect the human, animal, industrial, and social processes of urban life, and they have been intrinsic to the economies, cultures and societies of all cities. This entry will think through urban wastes in four ways. It will examine its spatial, then symbolic, then economic dimensions and conclude with a look at current shifts in governance of waste. This entry will focus on solid wastes rather than that carried in sewer systems or wastes of energy or intangible wastes of, say, time or talent.

Thinking about cities through waste is both necessary and revealing. Waste is a commonsensical term, but closer scrutiny reveals that it is freighted with implications. Thus, it has general negative connotations about a loss of resource or a loss of opportunity. It has also implied a temporality and spatiality about something leaving a bounded system—coming to the end of its life or being moved outside the system. In both cases, it is often connected conceptually and materially to wastelands, as environments laid waste or contaminated. Underneath most of this, there is also the traditional sense, then, that waste is whatever is left from a given process to be disposed of later. However, this linear narrative overlooks that what is a waste from one process may be a resource to another. Equally, there may be a fuzzy line between what is a waste and a stock of material awaiting processing. This entry thus uses conceptualizations from different traditions to unpack waste.

Waste at the Margins

Waste is central to urban processes—while at the same time being economically, symbolically, and geographically marginalized. Thus, there have been waste dumps and waste sites for as long as there have been cities because a concentration of people inevitably produces refuse and issues of disposal. The biblical images of the fires of hell were inspired by the burning of refuse at dumps in Gehenna, the valley of Hinnom at the southwest of ancient Jerusalem. This also became the site, ritu-ally contaminated by association with human sacrifice and wastes, which was then used for the disposal of bodies of animals and criminals—who had been spatially and symbolically ejected from the city.

The continued presence of peripheral waste dumps as wastelands can found in many urban writings such as Charles Dickens's Our Mutual Friend, with his account of “a tract of suburban Sahara, where tiles and bricks were burnt, bones were boiled, carpets were beat, rubbish was shot, dogs were fought, and dust was heaped by contractors.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading