Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Urban space lends itself well to semiotic analysis. When we speak, for example, of a city's tone, its tenor and ambience, its discernible character, its distinguishing qualities, its skyline, its iconic buildings, or its history, we are making appeals to its semantic power. In other words, it has come to mean something. That this meaning is socially, culturally, and materially produced suggests that it is open to interpretation and analysis. As the codes and conventions generating meaning are the foundation of any semiotic analysis, scholars interested in exploring the city as a set of signs have put forward a robust set of analyses of the many signifying practices that make up urban space.

This configuration of the city-as-sign, as a text and context to be read, offers a range of different perspectives on the nature of urban space and practice. In this capacity, urban semiotics brings together different approaches to the study of signs in the city, drawing from film studies, media and cultural studies, geography, literary theory, urban planning, environmental psychology, architecture, art history, sociology, anthropology, and communication studies. Although urban semiotics does not exist as a well-defined subfield of semiotics, its varied expression in other disciplines suggests it deserves consideration as a useful approach to meaning making in the city in at least two distinct ways: (1) As a concept that can better frame the many aspects of the city-as-sign and signs in the city, urban semiotics can be used to examine the built environment as well as the multifarious nature of social life in the city. (2) As a critical tool, the study of urban signs can trouble naturalized readings of city spaces, to reveal ideological underpinnings of various sites and practices, as well as highlight the social production of meaning in and through city spaces. As a medium in which meaning is communicated in a variety of ways, from the more mundane wayfinding mechanisms of street signage to the powerful symbols attached to its history, the micro and macro scales at which semiotic analysis can be applied to the city are as diverse as cities themselves.

Origins

The term urban semiotics was originally coined as the title of an anthology edited by Mark Gottdiener and Alexandros Lagopoulos. This collection offered an insightful statement regarding the study of signs in the city, but it periodized urban semiotics within a relatively narrow time frame. While it gathered together the writings of Roland Barthes, Umberto Eco, and Raymond Ledrut, among others, urban semiotics can be expanded to encompass a broader history. It gains some of its theoretical purchase from historical antecedents found in the work of Walter Benjamin who, for example, drew upon the writings of Charles Baudelaire and his experience of a changing Paris in the nineteenth century. The demolition and reconstruction of Paris under the auspices of Baron Georges-Eugène Haussmann highlighted the ways in which new meaning, and in particular urban governance, civil discipline, orderliness, and control, could be concretized through the use of statuary, the introduction of grand boulevards, parks, new building façades, and other potent symbols that this renovation was meant to signify. Ideology and power could be embedded in the structure of the city, it was hoped, through the imposition of a new kind of symbolic and material ordering of its streets and buildings.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading