Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Most of the towns and cities of Europe owe their origins and early development to the period between the ninth and fourteenth centuries AD. This time of population growth and commercialism saw the expansion of older existing urban centers, especially those of Roman antecedence, as well as the foundation of new towns established sometimes on greenfield sites, virgin land that had not been under the plow, and sometimes by being grafted onto existing preurban settlement nuclei. These twin processes of urbanization affected the whole of medieval Europe, but as is typical with this period, contemporaries wrote down relatively little about who was involved in shaping these new urban landscapes and how they went about their work. Instead, the main indication that these changes were taking place lies in the physical forms and layouts of these towns and cities, which in many cases have survived through to the present day to be analyzed by geographers and archaeologists. This question of how urban landscapes were formed in the Middle Ages has led modern scholars to look for evidence of town planning and urban design in the morphology of medieval urban landscapes. In those rare cases where contemporaries do refer to planning and design processes, historians have been able to piece together from documentary records something of those individuals and groups that were involved and how they went about their work. The results of these modern historical studies, together with the work of urban morphologists, enables us to see now a little more clearly how urban landscapes were designed and planned in the Middle Ages.

Medieval Urban Design in Modern Urban Discourse

As well as the relative paucity of information to tell us about how medieval urban landscapes were formed, a further issue that has complicated the subject somewhat is the way that medieval towns and cities are represented in modern urban discourse. Textbooks on urbanism, for example, still widely refer to the uncontrolled or unplanned growth of most towns and cities of the medieval period, drawing a false distinction between planned and organic growth-type towns. Both are preconceptions that are overly simplistic and unhelpful in trying to understand urbanism in the Middle Ages. In part, these misunderstandings may be traced back to the start of the twentieth century and a battle drawn between planners and architects working in Europe who used the medieval town to make cases for their own particular aesthetic or for formulating design ideas for new urban forms. Le Corbusier in particular had great distain for the medieval period and its urban-ism, and in his polemical works such as Urbanisme (published in 1924), he sought to paint a picture of the medieval city as barbaric and haphazard in its development and spatial organization. Those at the time who countered Le Corbusier's modernism by arguing for a picturesque approach to architecture and planning (such as Camillo Sitte and Raymond Unwin) likewise drew attention to the medieval forms of towns and cities, but while they were seeking inspiration in them for their new urban designs, all the same, like the modernists they too depicted medieval urban development to be on the whole unplanned and organic.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading