Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Beginning in the 1960s in the United States, dissatisfaction with the negative effects of urban sprawl led to an interest in growth management. Starting with the land use initiatives of a few local U.S. jurisdictions, today growth management has attained the status of a mainstream planning tool.

Definitions of growth management have changed over time, with each definition representing a different epoch and planning philosophy. The early definitions were related to emerging growth policies of the 1970s. Growth management was defined as a more effective means to time, regulate, or even halt an increase in population. During the 1990s, growth management definitions added governance, institutions, and incentives, as growth management imposed an ideological obligation on governments to establish institutional arrangements for using taxes, expenditures, and regulatory powers to influence the distribution of land use activities in a community. At the same time, more emphasis was put on collaboration and regional initiatives. Under growth management, local governments would aspire to contain a community's development in ways that balance competing land uses and coordinate interlocal benefits.

The various definitions make clear that growth management is about regulating and steering land use with policy tools. However, as planning has shifted over time, growth management has evolved from a singular focus on regulation to a more complex set of activities that reach beyond a single community and take various stakeholder interests into consideration.

Development of Growth Management

Growth management emerged as a movement in U.S. planning in the 1960s. Given the problems related to urban sprawl, such as environmental degradation and overstretched infrastructure, citizens grew more conscious of their urban and natural environment. Preserving environmental resources was the overriding concern of many of the first-generation growth management programs.

Following regulative and quantitative planning modes fashionable at the time, tools such as boundaries, staging, and growth caps were applied. These first-generation regulations were generally implemented in conjunction with existing planning and zoning regulations.

The development of growth management can be divided into programs driven by the initiatives of single municipalities and those driven by individual state governments. Prominent examples on the local level include Ramapo, New York, where in 1969 the community was divided into land use segments to be realized in a certain order (tiers; staging). In Boulder, Colorado (1972), and Boca Raton, Florida (1972), population growth was limited to 40,000 additional housing units. Petaluma, California, established a growth rate (cap) of 500 housing units per year in 1972.

State growth management programs grew out of land use reform meant to fulfill environmental protection goals. State and local governments would share authority to protect designated areas from growth.

Oregon's innovative growth management system has been a role model for other states. It was the first to empower the state government to control land use by partially shifting growth control power from local governments to the state and by combining different land use approaches. Of especial importance in the development of the Portland metropolitan area is the Metropolitan Service District, a regional government. One of the prime responsibilities of this elected regional government is to manage a growth boundary that curtails development around Portland.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading