Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Barrio is a conventional term for Latina/o communities. They have been fundamental to cities since the mid-1800s and were influenced by racism and segregation in relation to residential patterns in U.S. cities. Barrios are also significant in relation to Latina/o culture and identity.

Important physical characteristics of barrios are related to sustainable environmental features, in cluding mixed density, mixed uses (especially commercial uses in residential areas), live–work spaces, public transportation, walking, and recycling. Barrios are also noted for being a cultural community that exhibits the importance of social networks.

Prior to the late twentieth century, key urban problems in relation to structural underdevelopment were a lack of affordable housing, local economic development, and the acute failure of government to address urban amenities, including streets, sewers, gas, and lighting.

Barrios are also a zone of conflict with planning and urban policy elites. These problems include a lack of inclusionary planning, racism and elitism within urban policy, neighborhood destruction related to highway corridors, redevelopment and private sector development, gentrification, and land speculation.

Barrio formation is an example of how cultural transformations within working-class constituencies help them to recapture space in their own vision; it is also an example of the essential role of cultural practices in defining places and the importance of their symbolic representations irrespective of ownership patterns or attempts at social control.

Initial Era of Barrio Formation

Barrios during the initial period of urbanism in the early twentieth century were generally located in ethnically specified, segregated sections of towns and cities. Colonias were characterized by declining housing conditions; poor internal roads (in reality, dirt streets); and limited or no basic infrastructure in relation to water, sanitation, and flood control. Ethnic spatial separation was impacted by natural barriers or features of the built environment, including rivers, railroad tracks, and agricultural buffer zones. Latinas/os also resided in small agricultural encampments on the periphery of cities and towns. They constituted a renter class, with limited land ownership patterns through the mid-twentieth century.

Numerous colonias developed adjacent to local employment centers, railroad yards, manufacturing districts, and in agriculture zones, on the urban fringe. These “livable spaces” ranged from substandard homes, to tents, to shantytowns constructed from a potpourri of local materials. The conditions of these urban residential zones established the negative characterizations of Latinas/os in urban space. Locked into substandard, deteriorating conditions, the barrio was viewed as a repository of marginalized families with limited desire for improving their lifestyle. Regressive ethnic stereotypes reinforced situating Latina/o culture as a legitimation for the evolution of systemic residential apartheid and social repression.

Two typologies of barrios evolved during this period. Barrios in close proximity to civic centers, which were enclosed by rapid urbanization, experienced improvements in basic infrastructure associated with the conventional extension of urban systems. San Antonio, Denver, Phoenix, and El Paso typify this type of barrio–city relationship. Streets, sewers, water, and electricity were generally provided in these barrios. Although the quality and maintenance suffered from disparity in the allocation of government resources, the provision of these services was necessary in relation to the economy of the city.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading