Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The expression urban crisis functions as shorthand for a host of issues—social, economic, political—that appeared to reach a critical point simultaneously in many United States cities in the mid-1960s. Long-term trends in the mid-20th century included factory closings and the shift of population, offices, and retail businesses to suburban areas, which depleted cities' tax bases and left inadequate resources for servicing aging infrastructure and for responding to the social problems engendered by unemployment and poverty. However, the term urban crisis often conjures images of the violent racial disturbances that shook cities across the nation in the 1960s. It was, in fact, the riots that gave rise to the rhetoric of urban crisis: Rather than simply declining, U.S. cities suddenly threatened to explode. The urban crisis must also be understood as a matter of changing perceptions—the growth of a pessimistic, negative attitude toward cities—as much as a story of the real conditions in them.

Riots were usually spontaneous acts of grassroots retaliation against police brutality toward African Americans, fueled by broader racial injustice. Between 1964 and 1968, more than 200 separate incidents of collective violence occurred in cities across the United States, resulting in hundreds of deaths and thousands of burned homes and businesses. Broadcast images of these conflagrations and confrontations with police and National Guard became indelible images of the American city. Former HUD Secretary Robert Wood noted that, after the outbreak of rioting, journalists began frequently to describe urban affairs as “crises.”

Viewed primarily as a racial conflict, the urban crisis could be seen to continue through the desegregation and busing battles of the 1970s in such cities as New York and Boston, and even into the 1992 Los Angeles riots triggered by the Rodney King police brutality trial. At the same time, scholars, including Thomas Sugrue in 1996, locate the origins of the urban crisis as far back as the 1940s, when whites in the urban North responded violently to the arrival of southern black migrants into their workplaces and neighborhoods. But such strife was not new, for ethnic, racial, and labor conflicts had a long history in 19th-century American cities.

A Crisis in Cities … Or the Crisis of Cities?

Although it is true that cities have always presented economic challenges and social conflicts, by the mid-20th century out-migration (particularly from older Snow Belt cities) seemed to imply a new lack of confidence in the urban project. Many of the traditional rationales for urban density seemed to be undermined by the increasing mobility of cars, capital, entertainment, and energy. Racial discrimination and pro-suburban public policies ratified and even intensified these anti-urban trends, and many wondered if cities could continue to be viable, desirable locations.

Even though the United States was a rapidly urbanizing nation by the early 20th century, state and federal governments lavished far more attention and largesse on the country's agricultural sector as late as the New Deal, as noted by Mark Gelfand in 1975. Arnold Hirsch wrote in 1983 that, unfortunately, by the time this neglect had begun to change after World War II, public policy interventions often seemed inadequate. By the 1960s, highway construction, slum clearance, and housing projects, implemented as responses to urban problems such as congestion and “blight,” were increasingly viewed as exacerbating these conditions.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading