Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Trauma-Related Happiness and Pleasure

Happiness can be defined as one's pleasant emotional experience, positive cognitive judgment, and behavioral expression of satisfaction during and after pleasant events. Pleasures can also be defined as particular enjoyable events; physically, intellectually, and socially based activities; interactions; achievements; and material things that may lead someone to the state of happiness. In Western civilization, the discourse about happiness began nearly 2,500 years ago with the efforts of Greek philosophers to explore and explain exactly what happiness is. Thus, Aristippus of Cyrene referred to hedonic happiness as one's subjective experience to get things that one wants, leading to pleasant affects. Aristippus believed that pleasure is the only way to make one happy and, hence, a pleasure was acceptable as long as it made one feel good. Hedonic happiness is associated with one's sense of feeling relaxed, excited, losing track of time, forgetting personal problems, and so forth. Conversely, Aristotle contended that happiness (eudaimonia) is the objective expression of a moral virtue as a way to get whatever is worth desiring and having in life through intense involvement in daily tasks and one's feeling of being challenged, competent, concentrated in having clear goals, and intensely alive. Aristotle pointed out that this kind of expressiveness of happiness advances human beings' potentials, skills, talents, and purpose in life. Accordingly, the Aristotelian perspective of happiness requires high pleasures to achieve satisfaction. In the modern era, social scientists and theorists have continued exploring and discussing the nature of happiness. Since the 1970s, many theories have developed that define happiness as a goal-oriented mission, an activity-based task, the ability to adapt to certain events, the sum of small pleasures, one's view about incidents, and one's feeling in comparison with others.

Associating Happiness and Pleasure with Trauma

In the mid-1970s, some researchers believed that happiness is closely related to being young, well-educated, and healthy, with a high personal income. However, the advancement of research in happiness has shown that older adults, people who are severely injured, those who suffer a serious illness, and others can be as happy as others who are healthy and young. This data opened the discussion for the relationship between happiness and unhappiness. Currently, research findings support the notion that there is no linear relation between happiness and unhappiness. Actually, it seems that there is coexistence and sometimes independence between the two rather than an antagonism. In other words, one who is mentally ill might be happy, too. Also, that a person is not sad or does not have depressive symptoms does not necessarily mean that he or she is happy. Research data support that the thinking patterns are different between a happy and an unhappy person.

Trauma severely affects many nuances of one's life. However, can we imagine a traumatized person being totally sad without being able to be happy at all? Based on the information in this entry and using it as an analogy, it seems that traumatized individuals also retain the ability to be happy and to enjoy the pleasures of life. Even though coexistence between trauma and happiness might sound paradoxical, research data suggest that the one cannot exclude the other. People who were imprisoned in the Nazi concentration camps often lacked even a piece of bread to eat. For them, simply having a piece of bread may have been sufficient reason to feel happiness. It seems that, in the extreme traumatic experience of the Holocaust, the happiness of getting a piece of bread had two sides: the hedonic because they were able to somehow satisfy their hunger drive, and the eudaemonic because they were struggling to get a piece of bread and they appreciated its importance, hence changing the way they viewed the world around them. Furthermore, an interpersonal violence survivor might spend time with her friends going for dinner to a serene place. This experience of interacting with her friends makes her happy even though she is traumatized. Moreover, a sexually assaulted woman might participate in a social justice forum, fighting for the rights of women. Based on the Aristotelian view of happiness, her social action and fight for the welfare of the society makes her happy. These are some examples that support the perspective that traumatized people are still able to enjoy pleasures, have positive emotions, and be happy.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading