Entry
Entries A-Z
Communications
The ability to use complex language distinguishes humans from other animals, making communication the glue of human culture, religion, and social and political organization. In a democracy, communication plays an especially important role. Through the free exchange of ideas, unhampered by government censorship or control, an informed electorate can make the decisions required under the Constitution. In 1787 the framers of the Constitution addressed communications only once—in Article I, section 8, when they gave Congress the power “To establish Post Offices and post Roads.” Several years later the First Amendment (1791) took up the important communications methods of the times, stating, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Today the constitutions of many nations specifically address freedom and privacy of communications. Two of Sweden's four constitutional documents concern communications: the Freedom of Expression Act (1992) and the Freedom of the Press Act, as amended in 1992, which provides that every Swedish citizen is free to “publish his thoughts and opinions in print … and to make statements and communicate information on any subject whatsoever.” Romania's constitution (1991) states in article 28: “Secrecy of letters, telegrams and other postal communications, of telephone conversations and of any other legal means of communication is inviolable.”
Traditional forms of communication in the United States, such as religion, speech, the press, and assembly and association, are constitutionally guaranteed. The Supreme Court has held in several cases, including Martin v. City of Struthers (1943) and Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette (1995), that the First Amendment gives broad protection to communication of religious beliefs against government censorship. Similarly, speech in a secular context is protected, especially where it can be defined as political speech—the sine qua non of a democracy. Freedom of the press and freedom of assembly and association also involve traditional ways of communicating politically in a free, open, and democratic society and therefore generally receive broad protection under the Constitution.
However, the invention of radio and television, the telephone, and the Internet has raised new questions regarding the constitutionality of government interference in or regulation of communications.
Broadcasting
Under the power granted by the commerce clause in Article I, section 8, of the Constitution, Congress in 1934 passed the Communications Act, in which the electromagnetic spectrum (the wavelengths used to broadcast radio and later television programs) was established as a national resource. The act required businesses that wanted to use the public airwaves for communications, including broadcasting commercial and public programming, to be regulated and licensed by the Federal Communications Commission. In Metropolitan Broadcasting v. FCC (1990), the Supreme Court validated the government's policy of allocating broadcasting licenses on the basis of increasing minority ownership of broadcasting stations (see Minorities), stating that it would diversify the content of such communications media, an inherently good objective.
Because the Constitution does not expressly grant the national government the power to regulate communications but does prohibit government interference with certain types of communications, there have been a number of challenges to and changes in federal government communications policies. For example, the FCC's “fairness doctrine” in effect from 1949 to 1987 required broadcasters to grant equal time for replies to controversial messages aired by their stations. In Columbia Broadcasting System v. Democratic National Committee (1973), the Supreme Court rejected claims that the Constitution required broadcasters to sell air time for the presentation of views on controversial issues. Congress, which had enacted the fairness doctrine into law, repealed it, thus terminating the policy.
...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches