Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Stealth

Stealth is a term describing trans-identified people who do not disclose their trans status, so that most or all of the people in their lives do not know they are trans. Going stealth is related to passing—when a trans person’s gender identity is properly recognized by others—particularly since both practices typically entail compliance with dominant gender norms. Yet while passing can be unintentional or sporadic, stealth usually connotes a deliberate and thorough practice. We might also relate stealth to the notion of being closeted. This entry shows how medical and legal regulations specific to trans populations, along with the roles that race and class play in gender norms, help distinguish going stealth from the more general concept of being closeted and position stealth as a regulatory practice in itself.

Although medical standards did not create the concept of passing or going stealth, the development of a formal diagnosis and treatment plan for trans people strongly reinforced such practices. Medical providers used these diagnostic guidelines, which were codified in the Standards of Care first published in 1979, as criteria for treating trans patients. In turn, trans people who sought medical care had to meet the criteria in order to be considered viable candidates for medical transition, including approved access to hormones and surgery. One significant benchmark was known as “real-life experience” or the “real-life test,” which specified that before being allowed to medically transition, a trans person must demonstrate that they could maintain employment, healthy social interactions, and all other aspects of daily life in the gender role they wished to transition to. Such medical requirements contributed to wider perceptions that trans people wanted—and should work toward—a definitive break between their pretransition and posttransition lives.

The real-life test had several broad effects. It put many trans people at great risk by demanding adherence to strict gender roles while neither allowing medical transition nor intervening to counter the systemic discrimination and violence against gender-nonconforming people. It relied on individual medical providers’ own views of what successful femininity and masculinity looked like, views that frequently both depended on and reinforced stereotypical binary gender norms. And it conveyed that successful trans people were those who were willing and able to completely erase their gendered pasts and conceal their trans status in order to pass as cisgender in every instance.

In its 2011 revision, the Standards of Care stopped specifying particular criteria for a real-life experience. But the requirement’s effects had already moved well beyond the medical context. For example, many media representations, including trans autobiographies, have echoed the idea of making a clean break from one’s previous gendered life and have valorized the ability to avoid being perceived as trans. At the same time, part of the broader cultural investment in going stealth is the related notion that one’s trans status will eventually be detected. Many film and television representations, for instance, dramatically reveal a character as trans; the shock and spectacle of these narratives bolster common beliefs that trans people are hiding something that can eventually be discovered.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading