Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Intersectionality in Research

Intersectionality is a concept or perspective that considers the simultaneous manifestation or influence of multiple dimensions of identity, difference, and inequality. The use of intersectionality as an analytical framework in the humanities and social sciences has increased drastically in the past two decades. Much scholarship focused on trans people centralizes the roles of cissexism or transphobia. Given this critical sensitivity to privilege and oppression, scholars engaging in research focused on trans issues may find that several of intersectionality’s core assumptions resonate with their own. Furthermore, adopting an intersectional lens in research with trans people will allow scholars to add nuance and depth to what is already known about manifestations and consequences of cissexism.

The purpose of this entry is to serve as a primer for scholars who would like to incorporate intersectionality into research focused on trans people. The entry begins with a brief history of intersectionality, with particular attention devoted to its roots in the thought and praxis of (primarily cisgender [cis]) women of color. Next, the entry describes various approaches to using intersectionality in research. Moreover, examples are offered that illustrate how these approaches may be employed in research on cissexism.

Intersectionality: A Brief History

Even before it had a name, intersectionality had a long history. In 1851, the renowned abolitionist and women’s rights activist Sojourner Truth delivered her famous “Ain’t I a Woman?” speech to an audience at a women’s rights convention in Akron, Ohio. With this speech, Truth succinctly and incisively articulated how abolishing slavery—and thus freeing African American women—was core to the mission of pursuing rights for women. Other Black women scholar-activists who worked at the end of the 19th century and early 20th century—such as Anna Julia Cooper and Ida B. Wells-Barnett—also described the influence of multiple systems of oppression, such as racism, sexism, and classism, in the lives of Black women, their families, and communities. However, because of the very systems of inequality they critiqued, their intellectual insights were often deemphasized or obscured from history—that is, until their works were revived and popularized in the 1970s and 1980s by a new generation of Black women scholar-activists, such as bell hooks, Angela Davis, Audre Lorde, and the Combahee River Collective. As with their intellectual predecessors, this generation of scholar-activists drew from their lived experiences to describe the co-occurrence and interdependence of systems of oppression. This central thesis was at odds with the dominant ideology and praxis of prominent civil rights organizations at the time, which resisted challenging more than one axis of domination at a time. That is, Black women were often pressured to combat racism or sexism (or classism, or heterosexism, etc.) rather than racism and sexism.

The coining of the term intersectionality is usually attributed to Black feminist legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw, who critiqued the inability of critical race theory or feminist legal scholarship to adequately consider the influence of racism and sexism in the lives of Black women. She used the metaphor of a traffic intersection to illustrate how the discrimination Black women experienced (framed as a car accident) could result from cars coming from one direction (e.g., racism), from another (e.g., sexism), or all of them (e.g., racism and sexism and classism). Thus, the discrimination Black women experience may stem from racism and largely overlap with Black men’s experiences of racism. Alternatively, the discrimination Black women experience may stem from sexism and closely resemble the sexism encountered by white women. Importantly, however, Black women could also experience discrimination specifically because they are Black women—that is, their mistreatment is not simply the sum of racism and sexism but something qualitatively different and unique to them.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading