Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Differential item functioning (DIF) is a phenomenon in which a test or survey item performs differently based on the respondent who is using it, and this difference in performance is unrelated to the latent concept the item is intended to measure. For example, a test item might be more difficult for a male student than a female student even if both students have the same ability (and have gotten the same total score on the test). An example of DIF in a survey context would be, when using a 5-point Likert-type scale, one respondent’s “4” might be another respondent’s “5,” because of question or scale wording, though both respondents perceive the same latent value of the concept the scale is measuring.

The implications of DIF are vast. In the classic educational testing context, DIF can result in erroneous disparities between groups of students. For example, if a question intended to measure reading comprehension uses an anecdote about city life, rural students may answer incorrectly because of their unfamiliarity with the anecdote’s context, regardless of their latent reading comprehension abilities. In a political science context, two countries could receive similar scores on a latent regime trait—even if they diverge drastically along this trait—because respondents coding one country apply lower standards than those for the other. DIF is, thus, a fundamental concern in social science research that involves multiple respondents and one or more items. This entry details how DIF can vary in different survey contexts, offers an example in which survey design can affect DIF, and describes how to avoid DIF a priori, assess it post facto, and account for it in survey designs.

DIF in Different Survey Contexts

It is important to note that methods for assessing and accounting for DIF vary based on the focus of the researcher’s analysis. In classic educational testing contexts, the researcher uses multiple survey items to assess a latent concept related to the respondent. For example, to assess students’ reading capabilities, a researcher would aggregate over a student’s scores in multiple questions (items) to estimate the respondent’s latent capability. In this context, there are “correct” answers to individual items and ways to leverage other items to assess whether or not specific items exhibit DIF for certain subgroups. Idiosyncratic variation across responses, thus, reflects only differences in the latent trait or general measurement error, not DIF.

In contrast, in contemporary political science contexts, researchers often ask multiple respondents to use a single survey item to rate different subjects. For example, respondents might rate multiple country-years using a single Likert-type scale question (the item) about the degree to which elections were free and fair. In this context, the researcher would aggregate over multiple respondent scores for different country-years (the subjects) to estimate their latent level of “free and fair elections.” In this context, there are not necessarily “correct” answers since responses require informed judgment: Equally informed experts might still disagree whether elections were “mostly” or “almost entirely” free and fair, even if they understand the question in the exact same way. Idiosyncratic variation across responses may, thus, reflect differences in the latent trait, general measurement error, or DIF.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading