Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet
Allyship

Commonly used within the context of racial and ethnic groups and/or gender and sexual minorities, allyship is a term used to describe the process by which individuals from a dominant (or privileged) group (i.e., white, heterosexual, Christian, able-bodied, cisgender) support and advocate for marginalized group(s). Allyship has commonly been used in the context of racial and ethnic groups in addition to sexual/affectional and gender minorities; however, allyship extends to any individual or group support and advocacy for any marginalized groups.

One can be involved in allyship at various levels (individual, community, local, regional, national, and/or global); however, the goal is to eradicate oppression among marginalized groups. Allyship is not stagnant and is an ever-evolving process. This term is relevant as professionals have an ethical responsibility to advocate for all individuals, especially those from marginalized groups. This entry explores allyship, models of allyship, and how professionals can engage in allyship.

Models of Allyship

There are several models of allyship that center on various marginalized groups (e.g., racial and ethnic groups, gender and sexual minorities, those with disabilities). What these models tend to focus on is the process of allyship and the stages of development that allies may encounter as they aspire toward allyship. Some models tend to be static and linear where others may be more fluid in their approach of allyship. Models do provide a foundation for the process of allyship; however, there are limitations to these models. For example, some tend to lack intersectionality as an individual may hold both privileged and marginalized identities in their allyship. Also some of these models are not empirically supported and additional evidence of their effectiveness is needed. The following paragraph describes a few different models of allyship that are inclusive of marginalized groups as a whole.

The six-step model to becoming an ally developed by Anne Bishop and the model for becoming an ally developed by Nancy Evans and Jamie Washington focus on awareness, understanding, and education of oppression, which then leads into developing skills and taking action. The six interconnecting steps within Bishop’s model are (1) understanding oppression, how it came about, how it is held in place, and how we continually recreate it; (2) understanding different types of oppression, including how they are similar, how they are different, and how they reinforce each other; (3) consciousness and healing; (4) working on one’s own liberation; (5) becoming an ally; and (6) maintaining hope. Washington and Evans’s model for becoming an ally includes four areas: (1) awareness, (2) education, (3) skills, and (4) action. Keith Edwards’s aspiring social justice ally identity development model specifically addresses the “why” to allyship. Edwards’s model has three areas: (1) aspiring ally for self-interest, (2) aspiring ally for altruism, and (3) ally for social justice. The model focuses on the decision making or interest in allyship.

There is a similar process throughout each of these models. Ultimately, when thinking about allyship, it is important to understand that privileged individuals should not assume that because they have educated themselves and engaged in advocacy, they are an ally. Allyship is an identity that must be bestowed on those with privileged identities by those who are from the marginalized groups that professionals seek to advocate for, with, and on behalf of.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading