Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Identity development is a critical psychosocial task with relevance across the life span, but which plays a central role in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Broadly, identity development involves constructing an understanding of who one is and how one came to be that person; that is, identity is an understanding of self that is integrated and coherent across time and context. Successful management of this developmental task facilitates psychological health, the ability to connect with others, and the ability to contribute to one’s society. This entry reviews two main approaches to identity development, describes identity development across different developmental stages, and considers identity development in the context of different social roles.

Contemporary Approaches to Identity Development

Although there are somewhat divergent contemporary approaches to the study of identity development, which are described in the following subsections, these approaches share roots in Erik Erikson’s life-span development theory. Erikson proposed that there are three basic aspects of identity: ego, personal, and social identity. Ego identity has a focus on personal continuity, which is found when one is able to integrate one’s most important, basic, and private beliefs about the self, particularly in terms of how those aspects of self change or remain the same across time. Personal identity centers on how one defines one’s values or goals to others, which is represented in the negotiation of culturally relevant roles across various contexts (e.g., political affiliation). Social identity is the emphasis on the connection one has to a larger group, such as language or country of origin. Thus, identity development is a broad and multidimensional task and, for healthy development, requires an engagement at all of these levels. These processes are represented somewhat differentially in the two most common empirical approaches to identity development: identity statuses and narrative identity.

The Identity Status Approach

Jim Marcia proposed the first empirical application of Erikson’s theory, the identity status paradigm, which most clearly captures the assessment of personal identity, with the developmental issue at play focused on finding one’s roles in society. In particular, researchers examine the processes of exploration and commitment in various identity domains, such as politics and religion. Exploration involves seeking out new information, talking to others, reflecting on one’s beliefs, and other activities that facilitate thinking about one’s take on these culturally important domains of consideration. For example, in exploring one’s political identity, one may talk with others about their political beliefs, examine party platforms, and consider one’s personal values. Commitment involves staking one’s claim to these various roles, such as registering as a Republican or a Democrat.

One can take these two processes of exploration and commitment and determine four different places to be in the process of identity development, each with different implications for psychological health. Achievement involves commitment after a period of exploration, and is viewed as the most complete, and thus the healthiest resolution to this task. Moratorium represents the state of exploring, without yet committing. Although this is developmentally normal in adolescence and emerging adulthood, individuals in this state can experience anxiety due to the uncertainty about who they are or who they might be. Foreclosure involves a commitment to valued roles but without any preceding exploration. This can be conceptualized as adopting the beliefs or expectations of others, such as one’s family, without much thought. Individuals who are foreclosed tend to be more rigid in their thinking but have strong relationships with their families and are relatively certain about who they are. There are also some suggestions that the degree to which foreclosure is psychologically healthy depends in part on the culture in which the individual resides, with foreclosure potentially a healthier outcome for those in more hierarchical cultures. The final category is diffusion, representing those individuals who have neither explored nor committed to these various domains. This state of being is associated with poor psychological health, given that it suggests that someone is not tackling the appropriate developmental task.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading