Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Ego development is a product of ego psychology, a psychoanalytic theory about how individuals adapt to the reality of the external world while they also respond to internal needs and emotions. The theory is rooted in Sigmund Freud’s tripartite structural model of the mind that includes the id, ego, and superego. The ego as a theoretical construct describes a collection of capacities and abilities that are fundamental to day-to-day adaptation and functioning. Memory, attention, decision-making, emotion regulation, and planning are each examples of individual ego functions. Others include reality testing, impulse control, abilities for interpersonal relationships, and for synthesis and integration of information and experiences. Each of these capacities has a developmental trajectory that, when considered together, profiles the development of the ego. Ego development may be considered key to a self-psychology or a differentiation of a sense of self. This entry presents a brief history of the concept of the ego and ego development and an overview of two major theorists’ contributions.

Theoretical Contributions

Sigmund Freud, in his 1926 monograph Inhibitions, Symptoms, and Anxiety, posited that instinctual drives (id), moral and value judgments (superego), and requirements of external reality all make demands upon an individual. The ego mediates between these conflicting pressures and creates the best conscious and unconscious solution, compromise, or adaptation. Through maturing ego functions, the ego manages internal aggressive and libidinal impulses and, in balancing internal needs and external expectations, facilitates the individual’s adaptation to external reality (or not). The ego may also develop abnormally, so that there is only a fragile or even nonexisting adaptation to external reality.

Following Sigmund Freud, the psychoanalysts most responsible for the development of ego psychology, and its systematization as a formal school of psychoanalytic thought, were Anna Freud, Heinz Hartmann (with Rudolph Lowenstein and Ernst Kris), David Rappaport, Margaret Mahler, Edith Jacobson, and Erik Erikson. Anna Freud focused on the ego’s unconscious, defensive operations, linking the stages of psychosexual development during which different defenses originated. For Anna Freud, understanding how the ego defensively kept thoughts and feelings out of consciousness was most important both to working therapeutically with adults and children and also to understanding psychopathology across development.

Hartmann and colleagues advanced the focus on adaptation by putting forth the idea that the ego includes innate capacities (e.g., language, attention, memory, motor coordination) facilitating individuals’ adaptation to their environment. Under what Hartmann called an average expectable environment, these capacities developed autonomously from the influence of libidinal and aggressive drives. Hartmann and colleagues recognized that conflict is a part of the human condition, and certain ego functions may become conflicted by aggressive and libidinal impulses, as seen, for example, in eating disorders and attention-deficit disorders. For Hartmann, the developmental task for the individual as well as a therapeutic focus was to diminish the impact of libidinal and aggressive conflicts and expand the range of conflict-free spheres of ego functions to facilitate a healthy and flexible adaptation of the individuals to their environment.

Erik Erikson’s Developmental Model

Erik Erikson based his theories on direct observations of infant and child behavior and integrated those observations into a theory of ego development. For Erikson, the ego matured through stages across the life span because of a dynamic interaction at any point in time between the inner self and the external environment. Individuals were pushed by their own biological needs and pulled by social and cultural forces. In other words, the environment in which a child and adult lived was crucial to facilitating growth, adjustment, self-awareness, and identity. Hence, Erikson’s stages of ego development were framed as developmental tasks with opposing poles of pull or influence. At each life stage, according to Erikson, individuals learn how to hold both extremes of the challenge in tension with one another, and optimal ego development involves understanding and accepting both poles as necessary and useful. For example, trust and mistrust are both necessary to have a realistic appraisal of one’s environment. Erikson rarely assigned a specific age to a stage of development though there is an inherent maturational sequence to ego development across the stages. The eight stages are as

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading