Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Conscience is the rational faculty to judge whether an action is right or wrong, moral or immoral, and to act on that judgment. A well-formed conscience binds a person to do or not to do some action and, when some action has been done, it accuses the person if the action is contrary to the understanding by which it was judged and to defend the person if it is found to be in accord with that understanding. Conscience is an act of practical judgment that commands a person to do this or not to do that.

The 13th-century thinker, Thomas Aquinas, argued for the authority and inviolability of conscience. Anyone, he argued, upon whom a legitimate authority, in ignorance of the true facts, imposes a demand that violates his or her clear conscience, should perish in banishment rather than act against conscience. He goes further to insist that even the dictate of an erroneous conscience must be followed and that to act against such a dictate is wrong and immoral. Aquinas’s judgment continues to be the judgment of most contemporary ethicists. This entry discusses the relationship between conscience and prudence, the development of conscience, and the authority and inviolability conscience.

Conscience and Prudence

Conscience comes at the end of a rational process that includes experience, reason, understanding, and a practical judgment to do this and not that. It necessarily involves what Aristotle calls phronesis, the intellectual virtue we call today prudence. Prudence discerns the particular situation in which one is faced with a decision and the moral principles that may apply to it, examines those principles and applies them to the situation, and enables a well-formed conscience to make the practical judgment that this is the right thing to do in this situation with this good intention.

Concretely, prudence monitors the process of deliberation and judgment to ensure, for instance, that this is the right situation, the right judgment, and the good intention, to give assistance to the poor. As prudence controls the right giving of assistance to the poor, so does it also control the exercise of all other moral actions. It is a cardinal virtue around which all other virtues pivot; without the virtue of prudence, a person cannot exercise any other virtue.

Conscience and Prudence

In the human condition, all judgments, even the most prudential practical judgments of a well-formed conscience, can be in error. That raises the question of the erroneous conscience and its authority. Ethicists note that there are two poles in every moral judgment. It is always a free, rational human subject who makes a judgment, and so one pole of the judgment is a subjective pole, but every human subject makes a judgment about some objective reality—poverty or sexual activity, for instance—so there is always also an objective pole.

Subjects arrive at their judgments either by following the rational process just outlined or by somehow distorting that process. In the first case, the subject arrives at a correct moral understanding and conscience judgment about the objective reality; in the second case, the subject arrives at an erroneous moral understanding and conscience judgment about the objective reality. If a decision to act follows correct understanding and judgment, then conscience is also said to be correct; if it follows an erroneous understanding and judgment, then conscience is also said to be erroneous.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading