Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Objectivity

Objectivity, loosely defined in the context of journalism as impartial, detached reporting based on verifiable data, is widely understood to be the goal of many news organizations. Many argue that objectivity is a belief for journalists and the cornerstone of professionalization in liberal media systems. In those contexts, it is often central to journalism training and how journalists situate themselves in their role of mediator between newsmakers and the general public. It can be an effective defense to assure the public that journalists act ethically and for the greater good, rather than for personal motivations or societal elites. Yet, how objectivity is enacted daily by thousands of journalists around the world does not always meet those ideals.

Members of the public sphere, ranging from elites to average citizens, sometimes claim media bias as a way of discrediting journalism. It seems simple to do because while objectivity is a routinized journalistic norm, its tenet of producing value-free news is fundamentally flawed. This is because news personnel are limited by their own ideologies and selected realities.

There are also structural flaws in news organizations and greater inequalities of societal structures that influence the news process. To add to the complication, those in the public criticizing news bias are often motivated by their personal biases. Therefore, achieving total objectivity and the reputation of objectivity in news is nearly impossible. Nevertheless, objectivity continues to dominate journalism because associated with it are professional routines that structure news reporting, inform ethical standards in journalism, and help maintain journalism as a fourth estate and invaluable part of society.

Many working in the news industry acknowledge objectivity is more of a construct than a universal truth. To address its importance and challenges to journalism, this entry further defines objectivity, then discusses how it has evolved in journalism practices in both the United States and around the world, and why it is often criticized but still practiced.

Defining Objectivity

Since objectivity is central to liberal journalism found in places such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States, it is often associated as a primary definer of professionalism in journalism. Yet, objectivity is not necessarily emphasized in other contexts where professional journalism standards exist. Furthermore, perceptions of objectivity can differ according to geographical location, and other factors such as political ideology, experience, and age. Previous research shows most journalists are aware of objectivity and use its associated norms such as direct quotes, multiple viewpoints, and separating facts and opinions, but also use other approaches such as interpretation and pluralism. Consequently, though objectivity is largely associated with the United States and United Kingdom, it is important to note that objectivity as a professional journalistic norm is common but not always stressed in other contexts.

Several scholars over the years have tried to define objectivity in the news. Some of the first journalism texts from the late 19th and early 20th centuries did not use the term objectivity per se, but emphasized fact-based news reporting. Objectivity evolved to be loosely defined as impartial, detached reporting based on verifiable data. According to David Mindich, the following values are commonly associated with objective reporting: detachment, nonpartisanship, inverted pyramid style, naïve empiricism, and balance.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading