Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

No two productions of the same linguistic object are the same. This is true for every linguistic object that can be measured, from sounds, to syllables, to words, to word sequences, to larger stretches of spoken language, even in cases where two instances of an object are perceived by a listener to be identical. This is known as variable speech production. More specifically, within-speaker variability refers to the differences between the productions of what is ostensibly the same linguistic object by a single speaker. This includes variability in articulatory and acoustic detail of multiple productions that would generally be perceived as having the same intended pronunciation, such as multiple instances of the word government or the vowel /æ/.

This entry does not discuss cases of variability in syntax (e.g., producing Who am I speaking to? vs. To whom am I speaking?) or word choice (e.g., producing the word kitty vs. kitten in the sentence I love my [kitty, kitten]). Moreover, this entry does not discuss the many cases of articulatory and acoustic variability that occur between different speakers. It also does not discuss changes that happen within a single speaker over the life span, such as those that might be related to first- or second-language learning, or to changes related to aging. The focus of this entry is exclusively on variability in speech production across multiple repetitions of a sound, a syllable, a word, or a multiword utterance by a single individual.

Variability

This entry makes careful use of the word variability instead of the seemingly synonymous word variation. The word variation is used widely in studies that examine socially meaningful differences in language. Because of this, it has the connotation of differences that are meaningful and perhaps intentional. In contrast, the word variability is used widely in studies of individuals with speech, language, or hearing disorders. Hence, it has the connotation of a pattern of unintentional inconsistency. Variability is used in this entry for consistency’s sake and not to suggest a particular stance about a pattern being intentional, unintentional, or socially meaningful.

Social Meaning

There are numerous sources of variability in speech production within a single speaker. For illustration, consider the variability that might occur in multiple productions of the sentence I bought my kids new coats and boots. The first potential source of variability in this utterance relates to social meaning. Imagine this sentence being spoken by someone who fluently speaks two dialects, and that the vowels in bought, boat, and boots are produced differently in those two dialects. This is not a far-fetched scenario: Regional differences in the pronunciation of English vowels are pervasive, as shown in dialect surveys. In this hypothetical case, the speaker might be a middle-aged man (like the author of this entry), who grew up in one dialect region (Buffalo, New York) in which the vowels were produced one way, but who lived most of his adult life in a different dialect region where they are pronounced quite differently (Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minnesota). Alternatively, this speaker might have produced the vowels one way when younger, but in later life, he might have adopted a new way of speaking that reflected pronunciation changes that had been adopted by a younger group of speakers. For example, a hypothetical lifelong resident of Minneapolis–St. Paul might adopt a new way of pronouncing the vowels in coats and boots to mimic the more fronted pronunciations of these vowels that the younger generation has adopted. In both of these cases, the hypothetical speakers might adopt different dialect variants depending on perceived characteristics of the speakers they are addressing or based on the dialects being spoken in the particular context. Alternatively, these hypothetical speakers might consciously switch among the dialects to convey different attitudes toward an audience: The first speaker might use the local dialect variant when expressing solidarity with the locals and the other dialect when positioning himself as an outsider. The second speaker might use the more back variants when emphasizing his advancing age and more front variants when expressing a sense of solidarity with a younger audience. These types of changes in response to listener needs are common in spoken communication. The articulatory and acoustic detail in the target sentence might be quite variable across productions, due simply to a speaker conveying different social meanings.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading