Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Testing and Grading

Testing and grading in higher education have been debated since the early 1900s as educators have sought to identify the most effective assessment techniques. The assessment, or ‘testing’, provides evidence that stipulates whether a learner attained a specified level of understanding and mastery of a particular topic. At the end of an educational programme, educators use their professional judgement for the purpose of ‘grading’ learners, that is, they collect data related to the learners’ competencies in a particular topic by employing tests, exams, and a way to document the resultant outcome through a numeric percentage value that normally translates to an alphabetic grade.

Grades are typically spread over a normal distribution bell-shaped curve that assumes a few learners are top achievers, the majority are average, and another few are low achievers. Even though such a methodology has been widely adopted across the globe, higher education institutions use a variety of assessment techniques to ensure that a fair, comprehensive, and functional system provided a clear indication of the learners’ achievement, intellectual progress, and skills mastered. However, apart from not providing a distinct assessment of cognitive abilities developed that include critical and creative thinking, this typical method of assessment features a number of issues that require attention. This entry provides an overview of issues related to traditional assessment and grading in the context of higher education and explores alternatives in the digital era resulting from learning methodologies that have not only provided new resources but also novel and improved strategies to assess and grade.

Challenges Related to Traditional Forms of Assessment and Suggested Alternatives

The first concern is related to the fact that numerous learners underperform during an examination, whilst others not only perform well but also eventually get used to and take advantage of the imposed system. The resulting outcome clearly provides an irregular assessment of all the learners, thereby giving an unfair advantage to some, whilst not ensuring that all learners are tested and graded fairly. Summative examinations often give rise to disturbing experiences for some learners who unfortunately consider education a burden, whilst those learners who exploit the education system can potentially generate false-positive outcomes. Some learners who are not necessarily top achievers manage to climb the established academic ladder and access top positions and jobs for which they are not prepared or capable of managing.

To ensure that an assessment methodology provides a grade that is truly representative of the learner’s academic accomplishment, it needs to be formative rather than summative and embedded within the progression of the academic programme to better reflect the real academic achievement of individual learners. Furthermore, in order to ensure that learners are being appropriately and academically guided throughout their learning experience, they need to be provided with continuous feedback, and feedback upon feedback, to ensure a formative and healthy academic experience. Feedback facilities can easily form part of a virtual learning (online) environment that provides an ideal forum for mature learners to assist each other as well as an effective way to electronically keep track of all the learners’ contributions that factor into their formative assessment as part of the distributed system.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading