Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Technologies Supporting Self-Regulated Learning

The ubiquity and widespread use of advanced learning technologies (ALTs) poses numerous challenges for learners. Learning with these nonlinear, multirepresentational, open-ended learning environments typically involves the use of a multitude of self-regulatory processes such as planning, reflection, and metacognitive monitoring and regulation. Unfortunately, learners do not always monitor and regulate these processes during learning with ALTs, which limits these environments’ effectiveness as educational tools to enhance learning about complex and challenging topics and domains such as science, math, and medicine. This entry provides an overview of ALTs that support self-regulated learning (SRL). It also gives examples of key self-regulatory skills used when learning with ALTs, provides brief examples of four contemporary ALTs that are designed to support SRL, and discusses implications for the future of ALTs and SRL.

Self-regulation comprises a set of key processes that are critical for learning about conceptually rich domains with ALTs such as open-ended hypermedia environments, intelligent tutoring systems, multiagent systems, serious games, and other hybrid systems. Learning with ALTs involves a complex set of interactions between cognitive, affective, metacognitive, and motivational (CAMM) processes. For example, regulating one’s learning involves analyzing the learning context, setting and managing meaningful learning goals, selecting which learning strategies to use and when, monitoring whether the use of these strategies is effective in meeting the learning goals, monitoring and making accurate judgments regarding one’s emerging understanding of the topic and contextual factors, and determining whether there are aspects of the learning context (e.g., engaging in help seeking by interacting with either a human tutor or an embedded pedagogical agent) that could be used to facilitate learning.

During self-regulated learning, students need to metacognitively monitor and accurately judge whether they understand what they are learning and perhaps modify their plans, goals, strategies, and efforts in relation to dynamically changing contextual conditions. In addition, students must also monitor, modify, and adapt to fluctuations in their motivational and affective states and determine how much social support (if any) may be needed to perform the task. Also, depending on the learning context, instructional goals, perceived task performance, and progress made toward achieving the learning goal(s), they may need to modify certain aspects of their cognition, metacognition, motivation, and affect (e.g., regulate confusion induced by a complex science diagram in a hypermedia system).

Exemplifying the Role of SRL With an Advanced Learning Technology

The complex nature of self-regulatory processes is best exemplified by providing an example of learning with a multiagent, adaptive, hypermedia learning environment such as MetaTutor. In a typical learning session, a student is asked to learn about the human circulatory system for two hours with the system. The environment contains over 40 multimedia pages with hundreds of paragraphs containing thousands of words with corresponding static diagrams. Each of these representations of information is organized in a principled fashion, similar to sections and subsections of book chapters, thus allowing students to navigate freely throughout the environment.

Imagine a self-regulated student who analyzes the learning situation, sets meaningful learning goals, and determines which strategies to use based on the task conditions. The student may also generate motivational beliefs based on prior experience with the topic and learning environment, success with similar tasks, contextual constraints (e.g., provision of adaptive scaffolding and feedback by an artificial pedagogical agent), and contextual demands (e.g., a time limit for completion of the task, finite instructional resources). During the course of learning, the student may monitor and judge whether particular strategies (e.g., summarizing) are effective in meeting his learning subgoals, evaluate his emerging understanding of the topic, determine which pages and diagrams are relevant vis-à-vis a current learning goal, and make the necessary adjustments regarding his knowledge, behavior, effort, affect, and other aspects of the learning context.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading