Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The digital divide generally describes the disparity that exists among individuals and communities around the world with varying degrees of access to digitally mediated information and communication technologies (ICTs) and ability to benefit from digital resources. This gap has socioeconomic and educational implications as well as global impacts. The connections to resources—both to human resources and information resources—that these technologies afford increasingly influences globalization and economic prosperity in the current information age, both within the United States and abroad. Digital technologies open new pathways and possibilities for accessing information, services, and education by way of both formal and informal learning opportunities. This division raises critical concerns about equity—namely, that those without the ability to meaningfully use digital technologies do not stand to benefit from the connections and opportunities that digital access affords and, thus, may be at a significant disadvantage economically and educationally. This entry discusses how the term digital divide has been defined and some of the reasons it exists. It then discusses how the concept of the digital divide can be reframed and the implications of the digital divide for education.

An Emergent Definition

The term digital divide was originally introduced in the 1990s to refer to the gap between individuals who have access to ICTs and those who do not. The concept has developed from a construct that highlights the distinction between information rich and information poor members of society; this term was initially introduced to describe people with and without physical access to telephones and personal computers. As the Internet gained a foothold, issues of access were expanded to include online technologies and the broadband infrastructure necessary to support adequate Internet connections. In its earliest conception, access was primarily linked to physical ownership of these technologies.

On a very fundamental level, the digital divide describes a negative space. Embedded in the term is a sense of urgency that implies a need to take action to fill this space. Appeals to address the digital divide suggest that improving access to the digital technologies will become increasingly more critical among individuals and among global competitors. There is growing concern that people without access to the Internet are unable to participate meaningfully in the economic, social, and political life that is increasingly being lived on the Internet and through the communication and creation capacities that it affords. Assertions have been made that these disparities require acknowledgment and further study of the contributing factors and implications if the digital divide is to be adequately addressed in order to narrow this gap.

A holistic understanding also requires reframing the digital divide as an emerging construct that has evolved to represent much more than a lack of access to ICTs and digital resources. In recent years for example, it has widened in scope to include more-specific technologies, such as access to high-speed and wireless Internet services. More importantly, the definition has been expanded to include access to digitally mediated knowledge and the resulting skills and competencies essential for personal, professional, and economic success in life.

Contributing Factors

Overall, physical access is no longer a major issue in industrially developed countries. However, due to affordability (cost), weak information technology infrastructure, lack of reliable electricity, and usability issues, access to the Internet continues to be a problem in developing countries. By 2003, scholars had underlined the importance of looking at the digital divide not as a gap focused on access to the Internet on a bipolar scale but as a continuum; they argued that degrees of access to the Internet must be assessed. To illustrate this point, consider the following three scenarios, noting the spectrum of access among (1) a person with high-speed Internet in the United States, (2) a student in Accra who uses the Internet at an Internet café, and (3) a fisherman in a small village in Ethiopia who does not understand enough English to complete an online Diversity Visa Lottery form and must have his friends fill out the form for him. These examples demonstrate at least three levels of access to the Internet that are multilayered and complex. Thus, approaching the digital divide dichotomously is imprecise and overlooks essential factors.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading