Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Queer methods are those that are informed by queer theory. Just as queer theory does not involve singular theoretical viewpoints or specific propositions about gender and sexuality, queer methods are also often open to multiple approaches and guiding philosophies or principles. As that statement suggests, queer methods are often reflexive and open to engaging multiple and conflicting worldviews related to sexuality and gender. Despite its name, queer methods does not involve a singular theoretical view or a set of propositions related to gender and sexuality. Researchers in communication and other social sciences who are interested in developing and using queer methods typically are well versed in queer theory. Queer theory, similar to the word queer, can be contested as different scholars and/or activists make arguments within a given study about why a queer label applies. The lack of a stable meaning for queer or queer theory typically is not viewed as a limitation by queer methodologists and theorists, but rather is seen as a strength as multiple viewpoints allow for the possibility of multiple meanings. After further explaining the meaning and relationship of queer methods and queer theory in queer studies, this entry reviews some of the more prominent scholars and events that initiated an activist approach to queer methods research. The entry then describes in detail the six primary approaches to queering methodology: queer criticism, historical approaches, activism research, art-based research, autoethnography, and social scientific approaches.

Queer Studies

In queer studies, the potentially infinite multiple meanings that could be applied to a situation or context often are conceptualized as the result of different social orientations; the ways language, representation, and performance are politicized, both implicitly and explicitly; a lack of consistency or logical solvency in the many ways genders and sexualities are categorized; and/or recognizing that desire is just as relevant to lived experience and social justice as logic and rationality. Scholars who study queer theory tend to embrace critical and postmodern research paradigms, although queer theoretical approaches—and, thus, queer methods—can involve empirical interpretive or postpositive research studies. For example, qualitative researchers can use queer theory to inform the analysis of their open-ended interview data, just as the conceptualization or operationalization of ideas for quantitative data could be critiqued using a queer-theoretical lens.

Queer studies often examine both power and power relations, particularly regarding sex, gender, and sexuality. Although many queer theorists study gay, lesbian, bisexual, and/or transgender people and identities, queer theory is relevant to all sexual and gender identities. That being stated, typically scholars who explore queer topics tend to examine heteronormativity, or the idea of heterosexuality being privileged. Still, just because people appear to be ostensibly heterosexual (i.e., cisgender and attracted to people of the opposite sex) does not mean that they do not have queer aspects of their identity. The idea of a normal heterosexual person who does normal heterosexual things is a part of heteronormativity. Heteronormativity is the notion that people are heterosexual until something suggests otherwise, and, further, that their heterosexuality is standard (referred to as “vanilla” in some scholarship) and involves masculine biological males and feminine biological females. To that end, topics ranging from gender-alternative proms to forms of kink used in the bedroom have been explored in queer studies.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading