Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Locus of Control

How people interpret their environments and make sense of their successes and failures shapes their motivation to persist or the decision to give up. This is true for students as they work in the classroom setting and teachers as they design and implement lessons. Students make judgments about the control they have to bring about certain outcomes such as completing a task and obtaining a good grade. Similarly, teachers’ judgments of how in control students are of their behavior, actions, and outcomes also affect teachers’ motivations to persist with a given course of action or to implement a new instructional or management plan.

Teachers’ and students’ judgments of control can be described in terms of either internal or external locus of control. Locus of control is one type of attribution students and teachers make when processing and interacting with their environment. When attempting to manage a classroom of diverse learners, it is important to understand how behaviors are related to the different interpretations of control and how teachers’ own and students’ judgments of control can affect classroom motivation and behavior and how teachers can support students in making judgments to encourage more adaptive, productive classroom behaviors.

Internal and External Locus of Control

Locus of control, a concept first developed by Julian Rotter (1916–) in the 1950s, is defined as the judgments individuals make about the source of their control over the outcomes of their actions. If students feel the outcomes of their actions are a result of their choices and traits, then they have an internal locus of control. Their successes and failures at certain tasks are due to something within themselves that has created the outcome, hence the internal focus. However, if students feel the outcomes they experience are the results of other factors and not their actions, they have an external locus of control.

Consider Susan, a 10-year-old girl in an urban fifth-grade classroom. Susan is an average student in terms of ability level, yet she scores below average on classroom tests and benchmark assessments. Susan is not interested in taking her time on her work and tells her friends that all the work is too difficult and that she does not see the point in it. Ms. Parker, Susan’s teacher, deduces that Susan avoids engagement with her work because she sees her effort as useless. Susan thinks all schoolwork is too difficult for her and feels she cannot change that. Susan has an external locus of control in regard to her schoolwork.

Table 1 shows some examples of different sources students might perceive to cause certain outcomes. The internal locus of control is composed of cognitive elements and personal traits. However, the external locus of control is composed of aspects of the activity and elements that are out of the control of the individual, such as task difficulty, which is seen in Susan’s case. Also, as shown in the table, perceived control can be viewed as stable or unstable. For example, students who think they are always good at math and that their ability is what allows them to do well on the math test, consider the cause of their success to be an internal source that is stable. Understanding that there are differences in how students attribute their successes and failures is the first step to recognizing the links between behaviors. These behaviors are often the cause of class disruptions and classroom management issues.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading