Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Sign Language Teaching, Curriculum Models of

The last two decades witnessed growth in the number of schools that offer instruction in American Sign Language (ASL) and Deaf community and culture. Along with the proliferation of ASL classes and programs in schools, there was a rise in the number of curricular materials developed and used by ASL teachers.

The various ASL curricula that the teachers use differ in the selection of topics, the types of linguistic structures, and the degree of emphasis on vocabulary, grammar, and culture information in teaching and learning. The content, language forms, and teaching and learning strategies favored by each curriculum carry certain assumptions about language, teaching, and learning. The assumptions are often influenced by the prevailing theories and approaches in linguistics, psychology of learning and teaching, and value systems for topics.

There are two different tracks, one that is geared to children who are deaf, and another for largely hearing students who take ASL for foreign language credit. Some guidelines and standards for ASL curriculum were developed only for deaf children. Examples are Gallaudet University’s American Sign Language and Deaf Studies K–12 Curriculum Framework and the American Sign Language Teachers Association’s National Standards for Learning American Sign Language. However, they are not curriculum par excellence but standards that are expected to be met by learners of ASL and Deaf community and culture. The focus here is on curriculum—that is, objectives, lesson plans, instructional materials, and assessment. These are largely designed for learners of ASL as a second language.

Nonetheless, the basic percepts of the curricula and the standards and guidelines follow developments in language learning and teaching in general. The percepts began with the behaviorist paradigm, evolved into the linguisticism and communication paradigms, and now follow the conversationalist paradigm. Curricula in ASL as a second language are drawn as examples.

Behaviorism

The turn of the 20th century witnessed developments in the fields of psychology and linguistics that informed language pedagogy. In the field of psychology, behaviorism was proposed as a theory to explain how individuals learn. Individuals do not act freely but act in response to outside stimuli in a programmed way and by conditioning. Languages are to be taught in a way that individuals learn languages by memorizing strings of word chunks, substituting words within strings, and inserting different word strings into the word order. One of the curricular materials used in ASL classes that subscribe to the precepts of behaviorism and traditional linguistics that posit that languages are learned by drills, translation, and rote memorization of fixed phonological, morphemic, and syntactical constructions was A Basic Course in American Sign Language. Called the ABC, it contains a teacher’s curriculum and a student workbook, and students conduct exercises that consist of memorization, substitution, and question-response drills. In essence, students are asked to translate English utterances into ASL syntax. The American Sign Language Phrase Book stresses the memorization of ASL phrases for each topic. The topics covered are social contexts and situations, and the lessons consist of rules for ASL phrasal structures. The students are asked to memorize the phrases and are given drills, repeating their sign production until they attain a native-like level. There are no opportunities given by the curriculum for the learners to create phrasal structures.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading