Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Sign Language Research: 1980 to Present

In the mid-1900s, scholars such as Bernard Tervoort and William Stokoe were among the first to place signed languages under the microscope of linguists. Prior to the 1980s, most sign language research was perhaps driven by the need to prove that signed languages were genuine natural languages like other spoken languages. Most of the work conducted was related to American Sign Language (ASL). After the 1980s, most linguists did not need further convincing regarding the legitimacy of studying signed languages as actual languages, so signed languages started to be explored in their own right, sometimes using tools more appropriate for studying signed languages. And signed languages other than ASL were also studied. This entry briefly examines some of the trends after the 1980s.

What Is Sign Language Research?

People who study languages (complex and rule-bound systems of parts that create meaning) are called linguists. Linguists are interested in understanding what can make up a language and how these building blocks are combined (and recombined) in order to create meaning. Linguists can study the phenomenon of language in different ways—phonetics/phonology, morphology, syntax, discourse, sociolinguistics, acquisition, and so on.

Across those different disciplines, the same theoretical frameworks can be used for different languages, even those with a different modality, namely sign. This is possible because spoken and signed languages, both being natural human languages, share many linguistic features. Sometimes, however, different approaches and tools are required for the examination of signed languages. And when different methodologies are applied, information is revealed about signed languages that may bear true for spoken languages as well.

Phonology

Phonology examines how words (spoken and signed) are created from meaningless parts. Phonologists are interested in examining these parts themselves and how they can be combined with other meaningless parts. After Stokoe’s seminal observation that the sign is made up of meaningless parts, the study of phonology for signed languages has been taken up by several linguists over the years. In the 1980s, there was a shift from viewing the sign as a simultaneous unit (the meaningless parts largely occur at the same time) to observing that the sign is actually a sequential creature; it has a beginning, middle, and end with unique features (hand configuration, placement, orientation, contact, path, nonmanuals, etc.) that are active and can change during each juncture. With this shift, linguists have tried to better understand the nature of the sign in which features may persist through the sign while others are dynamic. This has caused some linguists to declare that the sign is both simultaneous and sequential. Signed language phonologists work to create models that allow them to examine the phonology of signed languages.

One aspect of this work includes looking at how signs are actually produced in everyday use. These forms are usually not in citation form (what one could call the perfect incarnation of the sign, that is, what one would expect to see in a dictionary). Instead, these everyday forms are modified in different ways when coexisting with other signs in the everyday sign stream. Such change can be called coarticulation, which refers to the unpredictable ways in which neighboring parts of signs influence one another. But sometimes when change is predictable and is a part of a certain pattern, this is known as alternation. Along with understanding the phonological structure of the sign, signed language phonologists are interested in describing patterns of alternations (sometimes referred to as phonological processes).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading