Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term weapons of mass destruction (or “WMD”) refers to those weapons whose destructive capacity far exceeds that of conventional weaponry. Nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, whether used by organized military units or by terrorist and paramilitary groups, could inflict large numbers of casualties. The suggestion that terrorists might use weapons of mass destruction to achieve their purposes instills great concern and fear.

There is little doubt that terrorists would use such weapons if they had them. Computer files captured from the al Qaeda group in Afghanistan in 2001 revealed that it was seeking to obtain chemical and biological weapons, although none were ever found. The Aum Shinrikyo cult in Japan prepared and used chemical and biological weapons in attacks on the Japanese subway system and other targets in the mid-1980s. Although relatively ineffective, the attacks in Japan demonstrated that a well-funded group could prepare and carry out such attacks.

Nuclear Terrorism

Nuclear weapons pose the largest threat because of their immense power of destruction. The technical difficulty and high cost of mounting a nuclear weapons program is a substantial deterrent to a terrorist group unable to obtain, from an existing stockpile, the uranium or plutonium needed to manufacture a nuclear weapon, or unable to obtain an intact weapon from a nuclear weapons state such as Russia or the United States. Stockpiles of plutonium and uranium, not to mention nuclear weapons themselves, are heavily protected by the nations that possess them, but the very size of these stockpiles and their worldwide distribution are sources of concern.

A deteriorating Russian economy in the 1990s posed a special threat. Had Russian facilities not been adequately protected, and had scientists and security personnel not been adequately paid, it would only have been a matter of time before a subversive group succeeded in obtaining uranium or plutonium. The international community, led by the United States, provided substantial assistance to Russia to strengthen its protective systems for nuclear materials. The heightened sensitivity of the world's nuclear establishments following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon outside of Washington, D.C., has led to further improvements in materials and weapon security.

A second form of nuclear terrorism involves the use of radioactive materials combined with an explosive package to make radiological weapons, or “dirty bombs.” This capability is surely within the grasp of a well-organized group, but the effects of such a weapon would be far less extensive than those of a nuclear explosion. While the extent of damage caused by a dirty bomb depends upon the amount of radioactive substances dispersed and the time it takes the material to decay into a relatively harmless state, such a weapon would probably result in evacuation and clean-up efforts rather than mass casualties.

An attack on a nuclear power reactor is another version of a radiological weapon. Crashing a heavy aircraft or vehicle into a reactor or its spent-fuel storage area would release harmful radioactive material. Nations possessing nuclear reactors are now attempting to enhance their security to reduce the probability of successful attacks on these complex systems.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading