Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The mail-borne anthrax attacks against U.S. citizens in the fall of 2001 demonstrated that every nation, even one as powerful as the United States, is at risk from terrorists using biological or chemical weapons. The attacks also revealed that the United States, like most other nations, did not have effective plans in place to deal with such an attack.

Terrorists have used bioweapons before. In 1984 the U.S.-based Rajneesh cult used salmonella bacteria to poison citizens by spreading the bacteria via salad bars in restaurants in an Oregon town. In 1995, the Japanese cult Aum Shinrikyo used chemical and biological weapons in attacks in and around Tokyo. Despite these attacks and repeated warnings from experts about the threat posed by biological weapons, the U.S. and other governments took little concerted action to deal with the problem prior to the fall of 2001. In the aftermath of that anthrax attack, many governments are taking steps to reduce the chances that terrorists can obtain the materials needed to make bioweapons, and to respond to outbreaks of disease if they should occur. In order to assess the magnitude of the bioterror threat, it is vital to understand how biological agents can be used as deadly tools and how terrorists might use them to instill fear or inflict heavy casualties.

Biological Weapons

Biological weapons use pathogens or organisms that cause disease in humans, other animals, or plants. Pathogens include bacteria, viruses, fungi, and toxins (poisons produced by animals or plants). Crude biological weapons (or “agents”) have a long history of use in warfare. In ancient times, wells were poisoned with the carcasses of dead animals, and infected corpses were thrown over the walls of besieged cities in efforts to spread sickness among defenders. During the French and Indian Wars in the 1700s, British troops gave blankets from smallpox victims to Native Americans in order to spread the disease.

Keala Loo, a firefighter with the Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Fire Department Hazardous Materials Team, takes samples of a suspected biological agent in a white powder form dropped during a mock terrorist attack on Ward Field, Naval Station Pearl Harbor, on August 20, 2008, as part of an anti-terrorism field training exercise. The exercise is an integrated, quick reaction, scenario driven event to train emergency personnel in the rapid assessment of and response to escalating levels of alert. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Paul Honnick/Released)

None

The large number of casualties inflicted by chemical attacks in World War I, along with the military's general distaste for using such weapons, led to the signing of the Geneva Protocol of 1925 (officially, the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare), a treaty prohibiting the use of both chemical and biological agents in warfare. However, that treaty did not prohibit nations from manufacturing or stockpiling such weapons, and many nations chose to do just, believing that the possession of these weapons would deter others from using them. The Japanese experimented with the use of biological weapons on a relatively small scale in World War II (Japanese forces attacked Chinese cities by dropping plague-carrying fleas from aircraft, for example), but other major combatants did not use them, possibly because they did not believe that these weapons would be decisive factors in the conflict, and possibly because they feared retaliation in kind.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading