Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

ALTHOUGH THERE ARE perhaps 200 or more recognized Protestant denominations, most are relatively small in numbers. The vast majority of Protestants belong to about a dozen churches or church traditions. These are the Lutherans, Anglicans, Presbyterians, United Church of Christ (Con—gregationalists), Baptists, Methodists, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), Amish and Menno—nite groups, Pentecostals, groups of evangelicals, groups of fundamentalists, Moravians, Quakers, and other smaller groups.

The Protestant churches cover a broad range of attitudes and doctrines on social issues. It should be noted that the laity of mainline Protestant churches such as the Anglicans, Methodists, Lutherans, Presbyterians, Northern Baptists, United Church of Christ, Disciples of Christ, and one or two others are much more conservative in their ethical thinking on virtually all ethical issues. An ongoing issue has been “who speaks for the church?” This is an issue over whether the beliefs of the whole of the Body of Christ, of which a denomination is a part, are those of just the clergy or of the church as a whole. Supportive of the latter position is the ancient justification for beliefs, that the approbation of the church is needed to justify what is and what is not Christian.

In Protestant churches, where a core belief is liberty of conscience, many denominations resist seeking to bind the consciences of lay members. Although this is an acceptable practice for church officers, the effect is that often the laity have different ethical views from those of the clergy, especially those who assume the highest church offices.

Social Ethics

The social ethics of Protestant churches cover everything from dancing, card playing, drinking alcohol, and smoking tobacco or other vices to nuclear war. In addition to the sins of the flesh, there are those that deal with issues such as divorce, racism, economic beliefs, homosexuality, and abortion. The latter issue has been a polarizing issue dividing denominations since the U.S. Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade (1973).

Protestant churches have adopted positions on the morality of abortion as a matter of personal Christian ethics as well as a social ethic. The social ethics of churches are their witness to the state and to the world of the will and justice of God. In the case of liberal churches, abortions have been allowed as a biblically responsible Christian ethic. The conservative denominations, including most evangelicals and fundamentalists, have vigorously opposed abortion as unbiblical. Rather, it is seen as murder in the form of infanticide.

The advent of in vitro fertilization led to general acceptance of this new reproductive technology by Protestants. The reasoning was generally that it was an advance over artificial insemination, which had been the method used by some childless couples since earlier in the 20th century. Many saw this as an improvement because if the father and the mother were both fertile, then the child would be their biological child. The great gains in reproductive technology that gave childless couples hope and often greatly improved results in child bearing also brought new ethical issues, however.

Embryonic stem cells can be taken from an aborted fetus. The use of aborted fetuses for embryonic stem cell research has been approved by liberal Protestants but condemned as unholy by the conservative churches. The reasoning has been that even though a benefit can be gained by the use of the stem cells, taking the life of a human being to benefit another is not justified. At issue has been of the moral status of an embryo or fetus. Controversy has centered over when a human being comes into being. For conservatives, human life has been defined as beginning at conception. For liberal churches, quickening occurs after the first trimester. The fact that the fetal material that is used for embryonic stem cell research and is in a sense saved from total loss is not a persuasive argument to conservative Protestants. In is argued in response that this way of looking at it could just encourage more abortions. Whether it is true in fact, this assertion is accepted as such.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading