Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The homogeneity of variance assumption is one of the critical assumptions underlying most parametric statistical procedures, such as the analysis of variance (ANOVA), and it is important to be able to test this assumption. In addition, showing that several samples do not come from populations with the same variance is sometimes of importance per se. Among the many procedures used to test this assumption, one of the most sensitive is the O'Brien test, developed by Ralph G. O'Brien. The null hypothesis for this test is that the samples under consideration come from populations with the same variance; the alternative hypothesis is that the populations have different variances.

Compared with other tests of homogeneity of variance, the advantage of the O'Brien test resides in its versatility and its compatibility with standard ANOVA designs. It is also optimal because it minimizes both Type I and Type II errors. The essential idea behind the O'Brien test is to replace, for each sample, the original scores by transformed scores such that the transformed scores reflect the variance of the sample. Then, a standard ANOVA based on the transformed scores will test the homogeneity of variance assumption.

Motivation and Method

Several tests are available for detecting whether several samples come from populations having the same variances. In the case of two samples, the ratio of the population estimates (computed from the samples) is distributed as a Fisher distribution under the usual assumptions. Unfortunately, there is no straightforward extension of this approach to designs involving more than two samples. By contrast, the O'Brien test is designed to test the homogeneity of variance assumption for several samples at once and with the versatility for ANOVA designs, including contrast analysis and analysis of subdesigns.

The main idea behind the O'Brien test is to transform the original scores so that the transformed scores reflect the variation of the original scores. An ANOVA on the transformed scores will then reveal differences in the variability (i.e., variance) of the original scores, and therefore this analysis will test the homogeneity of variance assumption. A straightforward application of this idea will be to replace the original scores with the absolute value of their deviation to the mean of their experimental group. So, if we denote by Yas the score of participant s in experimental condition a whose mean is denoted by Ma., this first idea amounts to transforming Yas into vas as follows:

None

This transformation has the advantage of being simple and easy to understand, but unfortunately, it creates some statistical problems (i.e., the F distribution does not model the probability distribution under the null hypothesis), and in particular, it leads to an excess of Type I errors (i.e., we reject the null hypothesis more often than the α level indicates).

A better approach is to replace each score by its absolute distance to the median of its group. Specifically, each score is replaced by

None

where Mda. = median of Group a. This transformation gives very satisfactory results for an omnibus testing of the homogeneity of variance assumption. However, in order to implement more-sophisticated statistical procedures (e.g., contrast analyses, multiples comparisons), an even better transformation was proposed by O'Brien. Here, the scores are transformed as

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading