Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Every day, a multitude of decisions are made that affect not only a small number of individuals, but also potentially millions of people. These decisions, which take place in hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, government offices, investing companies, and so on, are made based on incomplete information and under various conditions of uncertainty as to the ability of the decision maker(s) to follow through with the commitments made. Thus, nations declare wars with incomplete information as to the capabilities of the others involved in the war, and with uncertainty as to what the impact of these actions might be on their own economies and citizens. A pharmaceutical company must decide whether to market a new drug based on limited information resulting from the clinical trials and economic uncertainty as to whether the drug can compete in the market with other drugs.

Decision theory consists of techniques, ideas, and methodologies that are appropriate for helping the decision maker to reach a decision in an optimal fashion in the face of uncertainty. Given the universality of decision theory in corporate life, government action, and everyday life, it is not surprising to find that decision theory has been embraced by almost every scientific discipline. Thus, game theory permeates the theory and applications in economics. Psychologists know game theory as the theory of social interactions, and political scientists study rational choice theory.

All of these approaches to decision making have several essential elements in common that will be discussed below in the context of statistical decision theory. Game theory served as the precursor to most of the ideas in decision theory, and its place in modern decision making was cemented by John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern's fundamental work on the Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944). Although decision theory developed from game theory, there is a fundamental difference between the two. Informally, whereas in game theory, players make decisions based on their beliefs of what other players—whose interests may be diametrically opposed to theirs—will do, decision theory concerns itself with the study of decisions of individuals unconcerned with the plans of others—their “opponent” being nature.

Wald unified at once ideas from game theory and Neyman's and Pearson's mathematical developments in the theory of statistics in his elegant work Statistical Decision Functions. It is this approach on which the rest of the discussion focuses.

Statistical Decision Theory

There are at least three common elements to all introductory courses of statistical theory and methodology: estimation, hypothesis testing, and confidence intervals. As taught in an introductory course, these three topics may appear as being unrelated. Toward the end of the course, however, the student learns to “invert” acceptance regions to obtain confidence intervals, and also learns to use confidence intervals to carry out tests of hypothesis. In addition, confidence intervals are introduced as point estimates together with a measure of precision of the estimates, typically 2 or 3 standard errors of the point estimate. Statistical decision theory unifies these ideas, and others, into one paradigm.

Let X1,…, Xn represent the data observed as the outcome of an experiment E and let F represent the distribution of (X1,…, Xn), which we assume to be parametrized by θ, where θ may be a vector of parameters, and the set of all possible values of θ, called the parameter space, is denoted by Θ. This dependence of F on θ will be denoted as Fθ. The objective is to use (X1,…, Xn) to make inferences about θ. Faced with this problem, the statistician considers all the possible actions A (A is called the action space) that can be taken and makes a decision based on a criterion that involves minimizing the expected loss. This requires the statistician to define a function, the loss function, which represents the loss when the true state of nature is θ and the statistician decides for action a. This loss function is denoted as L(θ,a), and L is usually selected to be of the

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading