Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the second edition, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), are depression screening instruments published by the Psychological Corporation (http://www.harcourtassessment.com). The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report instrument (approximate administration time: 5–10 minutes) used to detect and estimate the overall severity of depression in adolescents and adults aged 13 years and older. The instrument can be administered orally as well as in group settings to clinical and normal patient populations. Symptoms of depression are evaluated according to criteria set forth in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.).

The original BDI, developed in 1961, was based on the clinical observations of Dr. Aaron T. Beck and his associates and the typical verbal descriptions reported by depressed psychiatric patients. Representative depressive attitudes and symptoms were consolidated into 21 items read aloud to patients by trained interviewers. The inventory underwent revisions in 1971 at the Center for Cognitive Therapy, University of Pennsylvania, and the amended version, the BDI-IA, was copyrighted in 1978 and published in 1979. In the original version, respondents were instructed to rate various domains relating to their mood “right now,” whereas in the revised version, instructions asked for mood ratings for the “past week, including today.” The most significant revision of the BDI took place in 1996. This edition, the BDI-II, instructs respondents to provide ratings for the past two weeks. Recently, the BDI-FastScreen, a 7-item self-report measure, has been introduced for use with medical patients.

Each BDI-II item represents a particular symptom of depression: sadness, pessimism, past failure, loss of pleasure, guilty feelings, punishment feelings, self-dislike, self-criticalness, suicidal thoughts or wishes, crying, agitation, loss of interest, indecisiveness, worthlessness, loss of energy, changes in sleeping pattern, irritability, changes in appetite, concentration difficulty, tiredness or fatigue, and loss of interest in sex. Four statements in order of severity are presented to the patient for each item and rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. A total depression score is obtained by summing the ratings for the responses to all 21 items. The suggested cutoff scores are 0–13, minimal depression; 14–19, mild; 20–28, moderate; and 29–63, severe.

During the past four decades, the BDI has been used extensively for clinical as well as research purposes and translated into more than 25 languages. In clinical settings, the BDI is often an important component of a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation, and it is used to monitor treatment progress. In empirical studies, the instrument is commonly selected as an outcome measure to demonstrate treatment efficacy. The psychometric characteristics of the BDI-II have been established in groups of college students and psychiatric outpatients.

Applying Ideas on Statistics and Measurement

The following abstract is adapted from Boothby, J. L., & Durham, T. W. (1999). Screening for depression in prisoners using the Beck Depression Inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(1), 107–124.

Especially when it comes to working in the field of mental health, using screening tools that are accurate is extremely important. In this study, 1,494 prisoners completed the Beck Depression Inventory as part of the admission process to the North Carolina state prison system. The mean score for this population corresponds to the “mild depression” range on the instrument. While overall scores for prisoners were elevated relative to general population norms for the test, female inmates, younger prisoners, close custody inmates, and those serving their first period of incarceration produced even higher Beck scores. Results suggest that a score of 20 might serve as an appropriate cutting score to determine the need for further assessment and mental health intervention in this group. Other analysis of the inmates' responses yielded four distinct, interpretable factors or groups of variables, labeled (a) cognitive symptoms, (b) vegetative symptoms, (c) emotional symptoms, and (d) feelings of punishment.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading