Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Employee retention has been and remains a key focus in organizations. The economic impact of turnover can be quite substantial, as the cost of replacing an employee has been estimated at nearly 100 percent of the annual salary of the position. In addition to financial concerns, high rates of turnover can negatively impact organizations in other ways as well. High turnover rates can lead to a loss of organizational memory necessary for continuity in operations and can create a situation where new employees lack seasoned mentors necessary for adequate socialization into the organization. Over time, a culture of turnover may also develop, where employees see the organization as a stopover or stepping-stone where one gains experience, with the assumption that they will be moving on in the near future.

Even when voluntary turnover rates drop because of unfavorable labor markets associated with economic downturns, the retention of valued employees remains important. Research suggests that high unemployment rates do little to stifle the mobility of high-performing employees or those with rare skill sets. Other research shows that large-scale layoffs associated with economic downturns serve to accelerate voluntary departures, as survivors separate because of a feeling of lost loyalty from the organization or to seek the certainty and stability of employment with an organization in a stronger financial position. Even among employees with more standard skill sets, managing retention remains important. A 2009 survey by the employment firm Adecco found that 54 percent of working adults, including 71 percent of those under 30, would seek new jobs once economic conditions improve. Substantial pent-up turnover may exist as workers wait for labor market conditions to improve. As such, managing turnover and retention remains an important focus in organizations despite the global economic downturn.

Turnover Theorizing

Turnover may be voluntary or involuntary, functional or dysfunctional, and avoidable or unavoidable. Voluntary turnover is separation initiated by the employee. Involuntary turnover involves the organization ending the employment relationship either for structural concerns (layoffs, plant closures), inadequate performance, malfeasance, or other reasons. Because involuntary turnover is initiated by the organization, turnover research focuses mostly on voluntary turnover.

Functional turnover is turnover that is good for the organization, while dysfunctional turnover has a negative impact. When low-performing or ill-fitting employees voluntarily step aside, that turnover is functional. Turnover is dysfunctional when employees who are good performers voluntarily depart. Retirements may be functional or dysfunctional, as the exit of veteran employees may make room for new ideas to take hold but may also represent the loss of valued employees. Because functional turnover is good for the organization, most research has examined dysfunctional turnover. Finally, avoidable turnover is turnover that can have been prevented by the organization, while unavoidable turnover may not. An example of avoidable turnover is a good employee who quits because he/she becomes dissatisfied; an example of unavoidable turnover is an employee who quits because his/her spouse is transferred to a new job across the country or to become a stay-at-home parent. Because unavoidable turnover is outside the control of the organization, most turnover research focuses on avoidable turnover. Thus, the turnover literature is focused primarily on turnover that is voluntary, dysfunctional for the organization, and avoidable in nature.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading