Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Factory work has been long considered one of the key characteristics of the modern society and economy in Europe that emerged from the Industrial Revolution of the 18th century. In fact, the factory system, with the gathering in individual workplaces of a mass of workers in order to take advantage of the new possibilities made available by new power sources (e.g., steam) and machines (e.g., power looms), played an important role in eroding the ties between rural workers and their areas of residence, and dismantling traditional work patterns in agriculture, often linked to semi-feudal obligations and accompanied by local support schemes in case of need (e.g., the Speenhamland system in England between the end of the 18th century and the first decades of the 19th century).

A corollary of the factory system is the establishment of subordinate employment as the standard form of work, so that free persons (free from feudal obligations) could voluntarily enter into a contractual relationship to “rent” their work capacity to another emergent social actor, the “capitalist” entrepreneur, in exchange for a wage. In this sense, the advent of factory work is closely linked to the establishment of a self-regulating labor market. The conditions of subordinate employment and factory work have contributed to the growth of new social actors, which greatly influenced economic and political developments in the following decades for instance, with the trade union movement and working-class parties.

The “working class” concept specifically refers to the mass of unskilled or low-skilled workers employed in large factories. Sociology, or work and industrial sociology, throughout the 19th century focused attention on the analysis of work in large manufacturing factories, because it represented the source of the main economic and social transformations, if not the core aspects of progress and modernization. Critical approaches, including Marxist analyses, underlined the subordinate position of workers in the employment relationship, their “exploitation” by employers as well as their “alienation” because of a passive and fairly limited involvement in the production process. At the same time, factories have been seen as places where the industrial social compromise between labor and management originated, with the support and participation of political authorities, in the 19th century.

Types of Factory Work

Therefore, it is possible to distinguish between different relevant aspects of factory work. The individual conditions of work within factories vary in the framework set by the organizational system (mainly Tayloristic in the “golden age” of mass production, and later influenced by Toyotism or total quality management), and with important implications in terms of the types of tasks performed (more or less specialized and standardized), the skills and competencies involved (low or high), the level of autonomy and independence in the hierarchical system, the role of teamwork, and the forms of incentives.

The collective relevance and implications of the ways in which the (structural) conflicts between management and labor were regulated at the heart of the industrial economy and society, essentially by trade unions through collective bargaining, varied. This was important because it was crucial for distributive reasons, and it influenced the degree and pace of economic improvements and upward social mobility in terms of living standards and consumption levels (with significant impacts on aggregate demand and further growth potential). Moreover, the consolidation of trade union representation in the workplace and the role of collective bargaining produced the advancement of industrial democracy, which is the extension of participation rights in workplaces that limited the managerial prerogatives to unilaterally define employment and working conditions. The general importance of factory work also varies, as long as it represents a reference that shapes important social institutions, such as family, with the male-breadwinner model of gender-specific roles in the labor market and within the family, or the welfare system, notably in those cases where benefits and protections are structured according to occupational positions, such as in continental Europe.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading