Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Women's wages are lower than men's across the board. Even legislation such as the Equal Pay Act passed in 1963 failed to make much of a difference, in part because employers continued to discriminate, as the case of Lilly Ledbetter demonstrated. The main factors, however, in women's lower wages are occupational segregation and the undervaluing of traditionally female jobs and job skills. The theory of comparable worth, a hot topic in the 1970s but relatively invisible in current literature, argues that revisions are needed in how job evaluation factors are determined and weighted, so that the skills, responsibilities, and abilities required in jobs held predominantly by women are rated higher and valued equally for their critical contributions to society. The Department of Labor compiles a Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT), in which jobs are evaluated for purposes of wages or salaries. Factors generally considered in job evaluations include education, training, skills, responsibilities, and work conditions. In a 1970s version, dog pound attendants and zookeepers came out much higher in wage value than childcare workers and nursery school teachers. Despite rhetoric about investing in children, this discrepancy reflects how little society valued women's work. According to research done to identify the criteria that the DOT relied on, “knowing how to care for children” was not considered a job-related skill, but rather a quality intrinsic to women. It received, as a result, no points. This approach affected the vast majority of women workers because 80 percent of women in the labor force held sex-segregated jobs.

How Much Change Has There Been?

Based on complaints and lawsuits filed during the 1970s and early 1980s using comparable worth arguments, often carried forward by unions in the public sector, job evaluation systems no longer blatantly dismiss skills that women acquire outside the job market or belittle skills based on who practices them. For example, AT&T was forced to revise its job evaluation system because it awarded managers points for “customer contact” but gave no points to telephone operators for their “customer contact.” Still, occupations dealing with children or predominated by women remain undervalued and underpaid. Childcare workers and school bus drivers still figure among the lowest paid occupations, especially when compared to workers who care for machines or drive semis. As more men have entered occupations once considered traditionally female, they have often found special niches that are valued and paid more. This has been the case among nurses and teachers. Often, market arguments are used to account for wage differentials within an occupation. For example, allegedly to attract more men into teaching science and math, schools have argued that they must pay more to compete with the private sector, even when private sector demand has not been substantiated. In addition, nursing shortages have not led to any substantial increases in salaries because the shortages have been dealt with through increased immigration levels for trained nurses. What stands out in studies done over the past two decades is how little occupational segregation has changed. Close to 80 percent of women in the workforce still hold jobs considered traditionally female, from teachers to nurses and community relations directors to administrative assistants.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading