Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Saussure, Ferdinand de

Ferdinand de Saussure was born in Switzerland in 1857. Saussure's scientific precocity was evident at an early age. In either 1872 or 1874, at the age of 15 or 17, he wrote a piece titled “Essai pour Reduire les Mots du Grec, du Latin & de l'Allemand a un Petiti Nombre de Racines” [Essay for Reducing the Words of Greek, Latin, & German to a small Number of Roots] (see Saussure 1978). From 1876 to 1880, he studied at the University of Lepizig, where he was taught and influenced by leading exponents of the neogrammarian school, such as Curtius, Ostoff, and Brugmann. In 1879, at the age of 21, Saussure published his monograph, the Mémoire (see below) while he was a student at the University of Leipzig. During the period 1881 to 1882, Saussure completed his doctoral thesis in the Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Leipzig. His thesis was titled “De l'Emploi du Génitif Absolu en Sanscrite” [On the Use of the Absolute Genitive in Sanskrit]. In 1880, Saussure left Leipzig for Paris, where he taught at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes and was involved in the activities of the Société de Linguistique de Paris. He remained in Paris until 1891. In that year, he returned to Geneva to take up his appointment as chair professor in general linguistics at the University of Geneva. Saussure remained in Geneva until his death in 1913.

The Reception of Saussure in the Light of the 1916 Edition of the Cours de Linguistique GÉnÉrale (CLG)

The reception of Saussure's work has been largely based on the posthumously published edition of the Cours de Linguistique Générale (1916) [hereafter CLG] that was edited and published by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger. Significantly, Riedlinger was the only one of these three individuals who actually attended and made notes on the lectures on general linguistics that Saussure gave between 1907 and 1909 at the University of Geneva. The significance of this fact lies in the way in which so many of the interpretations and assumptions about Saussure's thinking have been based on a text that, thanks to the editorial hands of Bally and Sechehaye, has substantially played down, altered, or omitted important aspects of the lectures, and their organization, that Saussure gave to his students at the University of Geneva. Readers may refer to the reviews of CLG by Jules Ronjat (1916), André Oltramare (1916), and J. Wackernagel (1922) for a sense of the early reception of the 1916 edition.

Moreover, a substantial body of previously unpublished notes and manuscripts by Saussure on diverse areas of research that occupied him at various stages throughout his career, as well as new editions of the CLG, based on the notes of the students who attended the lectures, have helped to shed light on a much richer, more complex, more diverse, and more dynamic thinker than the posthumous version of the CLG that was bequeathed to posterity by Bally and Sechehaye in 1916.

In the following sections, Saussure's work will be examined in terms of a number of different thematic areas that representing the major areas in the development of his thinking about language, seen as a semiological system of signs.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading