Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Urban networks refer to the patterns of relationships that exist within and among urban settings and provide structure to social, economic, political, and other activities. It is, therefore, a broad and inclusive concept that has been addressed from a range of viewpoints and academic disciplines including sociology, geography, and anthropology. The linkages that constitute urban networks generally involve the exchange of some resource, but there is great variety in the specific forms and functions of these linkages. An urban network linkage may involve exchanges that take human, material, or informational forms, such as migration, commodities, and e-mail, respectively. Similarly, such exchanges may serve economic, political, cultural, or social functions, including the respective areas of financial services, diplomacy, sister cities, and community attachment. Despite the variety that characterizes urban networks, inquiry in this area can be divided into three general categories based on the level and unit of analysis.

Micro-urban networks focus on networks among entities within a city and thus view cities as geographically bounded collections of intersecting and interdependent networks. These networks may be comprised of individuals or organizations and focus on issues such as how relationships among neighbors build a sense of community, or they may include inanimate objects like streets or power lines and focus on issues such as the efficiency of transportation within cities. The defining feature of micro-urban networks is their use of the urban context as a setting within which the relationships of interest occur.

Macro-urban networks, in contrast, focus on networks among cities themselves and thus view cities as the entities that constitute a national or global network. These networks may focus on a number of intercity exchanges, including trade or tourism, and often are used to identify or rank the most dominant or powerful cities. Between these two extremes—micro-level networks within cities and macro-level networks between cities—a meso-level approach to urban networks has emerged that views clusters of cities as a type of network. Such meso-urban networks examine how metropolitan areas are held together through linkages like those illustrated by commuting patterns.

Micro-Urban Networks: Within Cities

A central challenge for urban researchers has been specifying the causal connection between the aggregate features of cities, such as neighborhoods and segregation, and the individual characteristics of urban dwellers, such as lifestyles and demographics. Micro-urban networks—the patterns of relationships that exist among people and objects in cities—have been identified as the missing link that bridges these two urban phenomena. This approach has a long history, originating with Georg Simmel's 1903 essay “The Metropolis and Mental Life,” in which he aimed to link the pace and overstimulation of modern cities to a blasé and reserved attitude by pointing to the restructuring of personal relationships (for example, as instrumental rather than intimate) necessitated by urban life. Since this early application, micro-urban networks have been examined in a wide range of contexts using several different empirical methodologies.

Many researchers have examined micro-urban networks that focus on the relationships among people living in cities, seeking to understand how broad urban patterns and processes are the consequence of these relationships. Since Simmel's work at the beginning of the 20th century, many have hypothesized the decline of community in cities: as cities grow larger, individuals' sense of community and belonging declines. The influence of city size on one's personal social networks clarifies why this may happen. A person living in a large city may know and interact with large numbers of others, but with a fixed amount of time in each day. This increase in the size of the social network (i.e., quantity) requires a corresponding decrease in the depth and duration (i.e., quality) of each of those relationships. With the advanced technological infrastructures that cities provide, many of these relationships have shifted from face-to-face interactions on the street to virtual interactions on the Internet, leading some to ask whether this transition will usher another wave of community decline or rather if the ease of maintaining electronically mediated relationships will permit greater intimacy and promote the formation of social capital. Closely related to these issues is the role of urban personal networks in facilitating place attachment, which refers to individuals' emotional connection to a particular location, such as neighborhood pride. Through repeated interactions with the same others, a merely physical space can become a socially relevant place, around which residents structure their daily lives and invest their economic and emotional resources.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading